so as it stands, I presented evidence that no one could answer, while I put criticisms of your evidence

yes that one

@Tam --
im on the Desktop Client, version of discord, ..when i click that link, it just brings me to the webpage, to "sign in" , on my web Browser,, but lol im on the > program version of Discord (what everyone that uses dcord, should be on, lol,,, in my opinion, but)


edit , lol ..you deleted your post x D lol

...i domt have pc

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/565791128213913600/576568105921151014/Screenshot_20190502-181219_Discord.jpg

Just curious 🤔

but yeah, I am constantly presenting evidence of a global earth, that is then not refuted but rather jumped over, and when other's present evidence of a flat earth, I look into it and find inconsistencies / issues, that I presented

lmao earth is weird

@Tam -- that is not how we present the earth to be 😆

sighs!
smh at u 🤣

I also wanna ask, why is it i can only see people with the flat earther role being able to post images? Some sort of censorship?

I don't understand then why people believe in a flat earth, if the evidence of a global earth isn't being refuted, and the evidence of a flat earth is always being refuted

I know that one was dumb 🤣

you can post links (url addresses) for pics or vids or whatever

No i cannot

....yeah tho ..we've all mostly seen that meme u posted, ..before ; )

Invalid arguments provided: "tho ..we've all mostly seen that mem u posted, ..before ; )" is not a whole number

<:lul:484994724118134784>

Ive tried to send many images directly before. No idea why i cant send stuff without making it a link first

Answer qubit? @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧

Im curious

Nasa image. ^^^

More than 239,000 miles away.

So by default. You’d have to admit this pic, and the pale blue dot, don’t match.

@Tam -- i would have to re-watch the vids id say

--as i already said

Oh k

and that's fine, but it's become a consistent event where I give evidence that never gets refuted, and I'm able to refute the evidence posted, and when i do, new evidence is posted that also get's refuted

and I have to wonder why is the evidence believed if it isn't understood in the first place?

I understand what I am posting, why does the same not happen with flat earthers? like in the case of the perspective video you posted Mike

it happened with Derek just now as well, when I mentioned my initial evidence, and then put his evidence under criticism

and that's just 2 cases today

other days I've been here, same thing

there is a certain point where, after you've seen enough reasons to believe something, and enough times that the other argument is refuted, where it makes sense to believe the argument with evidence behind it

all you're doing. "blowing >> hot-air" <:lul:484994724118134784>

--with ..no substance or merit

just words, ...hot-air, smh

well why ignore the evidence I provided and call it hot air?

like you say one thing, but just scrolling up shows the contrary

do u see im in voice chat, chit-chatting, atm? lol?..