Qubit
Discord ID: 558599196308013059
131 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next
@CarolKook16 wanna talk about it on voice?
Dennis wasn't able to respond to my points on the earth being a globe
alright, well if anyone wants too, I'm down
I do want to say though
that usually when going down the points, the person arguing for Flat Earth being true leave my point hanging
but I'm always down for a civil discussion, sure you don't want to have one before going to sleep?
I'm in the Debate VC if anyone is down
you still there @Citizen Z ?
would be down to chatting
again, i ask a flat earther to discuss it and they don't want to
I'm in the discord voice chat if any flat earther wants to discuss it, happy to have a civil discussion
@Jellie where is the air pressure next to vacuum happening without a barrier?
@Jellie want to go to the voice chat below us? Don't wnat to interrupt the people here if they are having a discussion on something else
If there is unfair treatment by an enforcer, is there a place I can post a complaint + the context?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tOCodgq1oM8
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/565791128213913600/575804824227151872/unknown.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CQGjNu6Inak https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/561624862158749697/569260407240261632/unknown.png
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RapVrOQwv8o
Would anyone who believes in the earth being flat be down to talk about it in the Flat Earth Chat?
Would anyone who believes in the earth being flat be down to talk about it in the Flat Earth Chat?
hi Mike ๐
sounds good man
awesome, I didn't want to interrupt what you guys were doing, which is why i went dwon here
sounds good ๐
ok so responded
I was muted apparently, cause I can't present my argument
this is why we use instruments for measurements
..
@โงMike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)โง a)
just watched the video, here are some points
a) 2m40seconds, he mis represents what the physicist says, an "infinitely big earth" is not an Earth of radius 3959 miles, the radius would be infinite, over 1 million miles, over 1 billion
b) at 4:14, those lines are not parrallel (that he says they are), those lines represent the line that is emitted from the object on the light, in different angles
c) 4:27 vs 4:35 , the 2 pictures show 2 different things. first one shows what someone would see when looking straight, the second one shows who would see the same dot, at which angles, which means 6:17 the youtuber apparently decided to put the position of the sun in the line of sight of a trivial point further ahead, because it looked nice
interestingly, the top comment had a similar criticism
but yeah, Mike I took the time to answer your questions
more than happy to do more later, but those are criticisms of the evidence you provided
more than happy to hear your criticism's of mine if you have any
I did, the 3 points I both dmed and posted here
all 3 were points showing why the perspective argument you presented with your images/videos are incorrect
```a) 2m40seconds, he mis represents what the physicist says, an "infinitely big earth" is not an Earth of radius 3959 miles, the radius would be infinite, over 1 million miles, over 1 billion
b) at 4:14, those lines are not parrallel (that he says they are), those lines represent the line that is emitted from the object on the light, in different angles
c) 4:27 vs 4:35 , the 2 pictures show 2 different things. first one shows what someone would see when looking straight, the second one shows who would see the same dot, at which angles, which means 6:17 the youtuber apparently decided to put the position of the sun in the line of sight of a trivial point further ahead, because it looked nice
interestingly, the top comment had a similar criticism```
those are just 3 ofthem of the initial parts of the video
you posted this video above
and the images you posted are from that video
but you used the video and images of the video, and i went through them and gave criticisms of it
so as it stands, I presented evidence that no one could answer, while I put criticisms of your evidence
yes that one
but yeah, I am constantly presenting evidence of a global earth, that is then not refuted but rather jumped over, and when other's present evidence of a flat earth, I look into it and find inconsistencies / issues, that I presented
I don't understand then why people believe in a flat earth, if the evidence of a global earth isn't being refuted, and the evidence of a flat earth is always being refuted
and that's fine, but it's become a consistent event where I give evidence that never gets refuted, and I'm able to refute the evidence posted, and when i do, new evidence is posted that also get's refuted
and I have to wonder why is the evidence believed if it isn't understood in the first place?
I understand what I am posting, why does the same not happen with flat earthers? like in the case of the perspective video you posted Mike
it happened with Derek just now as well, when I mentioned my initial evidence, and then put his evidence under criticism
and that's just 2 cases today
other days I've been here, same thing
there is a certain point where, after you've seen enough reasons to believe something, and enough times that the other argument is refuted, where it makes sense to believe the argument with evidence behind it
well why ignore the evidence I provided and call it hot air?
like you say one thing, but just scrolling up shows the contrary
yes, what's the problem?
text is posted and questions are asked so that when another person has the time to read them they can answer
ok, but it's a reaccuring event that people are busy , and the conversation always ends with the evidence of a globe not refuted, the evidence of a flat earth refuted
it always ends there, the conversation, way too often
lol, you can say that, but it's true what I'm typing
"smh" doesn't answer the questions that you are ignoring
๐
๐ "smh"
remember the "smh" argument?
that "smh" argument was a good one mate
you were @P.
๐
I remember that day
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9s1IRJbL2Co @The Gwench ok read through it all ,
'I was muted?
wait
I can't have a conversation where I am muted
this is the same that happened last time
Sheeple
this is very inappropriate
I wasn't able to give a reply to your suggestion
@Human Sheeple muting someone like this is not the right way to have a conversation
If my voice isn't allowed to speak here , even when I am being polite and allowing you to speak more and over me
I do see this as you controlling the narrative and direction of the conversation
thank you to anyone who did in fact have civil discussino
I appreciate the ones who did, but I am looking to have a conversation where both sides are being fair
and @Human Sheeple you have not been fair to me
131 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2
| Next