Message from @Qubit
Discord ID: 576572526818361374
Answer qubit? @✧Mike Flatbird (Mike Blackbird)✧
Im curious
Nasa image. ^^^
More than 239,000 miles away.
So by default. You’d have to admit this pic, and the pale blue dot, don’t match.
@Tam -- i would have to re-watch the vids id say
--as i already said
Oh k
and that's fine, but it's become a consistent event where I give evidence that never gets refuted, and I'm able to refute the evidence posted, and when i do, new evidence is posted that also get's refuted
and I have to wonder why is the evidence believed if it isn't understood in the first place?
I understand what I am posting, why does the same not happen with flat earthers? like in the case of the perspective video you posted Mike
it happened with Derek just now as well, when I mentioned my initial evidence, and then put his evidence under criticism
and that's just 2 cases today
other days I've been here, same thing
there is a certain point where, after you've seen enough reasons to believe something, and enough times that the other argument is refuted, where it makes sense to believe the argument with evidence behind it
all you're doing. "blowing >> hot-air" <:lul:484994724118134784>
--with ..no substance or merit
just words, ...hot-air, smh
well why ignore the evidence I provided and call it hot air?
do u see im in voice chat, chit-chatting, atm? lol?..
yes, what's the problem?
it means im busy right now
text is posted and questions are asked so that when another person has the time to read them they can answer
ok, but it's a reaccuring event that people are busy , and the conversation always ends with the evidence of a globe not refuted, the evidence of a flat earth refuted
it always ends there, the conversation, way too often
dude, smh at u 😆
lol, you can say that, but it's true what I'm typing
"smh" doesn't answer the questions that you are ignoring
👍
dude
i
am
in
voice chat
m'kayyy 🍼 🤤
derp
--smh..........
Hmm
👍 "smh"
Smh
remember the "smh" argument?
that "smh" argument was a good one mate