Message from @Qubit

Discord ID: 576571789661044747


2019-05-11 00:41:34 UTC  

you can post links (url addresses) for pics or vids or whatever

2019-05-11 00:41:48 UTC  

No i cannot

2019-05-11 00:41:49 UTC  

....yeah tho ..we've all mostly seen that meme u posted, ..before ; )

2019-05-11 00:41:49 UTC  

Invalid arguments provided: "tho ..we've all mostly seen that mem u posted, ..before ; )" is not a whole number

2019-05-11 00:42:26 UTC  

<:lul:484994724118134784>

2019-05-11 00:42:49 UTC  

Ive tried to send many images directly before. No idea why i cant send stuff without making it a link first

2019-05-11 00:43:53 UTC  
2019-05-11 00:44:03 UTC  

Im curious

2019-05-11 00:46:31 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/564598119590002708/576570803475447809/image0.jpg

2019-05-11 00:46:41 UTC  

Nasa image. ^^^

2019-05-11 00:46:53 UTC  

More than 239,000 miles away.

2019-05-11 00:47:30 UTC  

So by default. You’d have to admit this pic, and the pale blue dot, don’t match.

2019-05-11 00:47:53 UTC  

@Tam -- i would have to re-watch the vids id say

2019-05-11 00:48:04 UTC  

--as i already said

2019-05-11 00:48:30 UTC  

Oh k

2019-05-11 00:48:48 UTC  

and that's fine, but it's become a consistent event where I give evidence that never gets refuted, and I'm able to refute the evidence posted, and when i do, new evidence is posted that also get's refuted

2019-05-11 00:49:14 UTC  

and I have to wonder why is the evidence believed if it isn't understood in the first place?

2019-05-11 00:49:39 UTC  

I understand what I am posting, why does the same not happen with flat earthers? like in the case of the perspective video you posted Mike

2019-05-11 00:50:16 UTC  

it happened with Derek just now as well, when I mentioned my initial evidence, and then put his evidence under criticism

2019-05-11 00:50:20 UTC  

and that's just 2 cases today

2019-05-11 00:50:26 UTC  

other days I've been here, same thing

2019-05-11 00:51:38 UTC  

there is a certain point where, after you've seen enough reasons to believe something, and enough times that the other argument is refuted, where it makes sense to believe the argument with evidence behind it

2019-05-11 00:52:44 UTC  

all you're doing. "blowing >> hot-air" <:lul:484994724118134784>

2019-05-11 00:52:56 UTC  

--with ..no substance or merit

2019-05-11 00:53:07 UTC  

just words, ...hot-air, smh

2019-05-11 00:53:11 UTC  

well why ignore the evidence I provided and call it hot air?

2019-05-11 00:53:22 UTC  

like you say one thing, but just scrolling up shows the contrary

2019-05-11 00:53:28 UTC  

do u see im in voice chat, chit-chatting, atm? lol?..

2019-05-11 00:53:52 UTC  

yes, what's the problem?

2019-05-11 00:54:03 UTC  

it means im busy right now

2019-05-11 00:54:05 UTC  

text is posted and questions are asked so that when another person has the time to read them they can answer

2019-05-11 00:54:32 UTC  

ok, but it's a reaccuring event that people are busy , and the conversation always ends with the evidence of a globe not refuted, the evidence of a flat earth refuted

2019-05-11 00:54:46 UTC  

it always ends there, the conversation, way too often

2019-05-11 00:55:03 UTC  

dude, smh at u 😆

2019-05-11 00:55:16 UTC  

lol, you can say that, but it's true what I'm typing

2019-05-11 00:55:29 UTC  

"smh" doesn't answer the questions that you are ignoring

2019-05-11 00:55:38 UTC  

👍

2019-05-11 00:55:39 UTC  

dude

2019-05-11 00:55:47 UTC  

i
am
in
voice chat

2019-05-11 00:56:01 UTC  

m'kayyy 🍼 🤤
derp