Nice serpents

love em

california kingsnake people

HE HAS ONE PARIETAL EYE

it's an evolutionary adaptation to overhead predation

it allows them to sense when a bird is about to nom them

I raised four different kinds of snakes as a kid bull snakes red racers corn snakes and king snakes

LEAVE ME ALLOOOOONE

🎶

And then I got a couple of blue boas

My dad and I roamed the hills of camp Pendleton and would get diamond back rattlesnake‘s for the San Diego zoo to use them for trading to all the zoos around the world

That snake looks like a cow

Rare albino type snake

snek

<:CHECK6:403540120181145611> @Deleted User has been warned
```
reason: Bad word usage
```

ok then

What an entrance

vc is actually 🇷 etarded right now

<:vcislit:507995456899514380>

It's all your own and I can tell it comes naturally

think I'll go do something more important than arguing with brick walls

@Deleted User <:BigSmiles:556070613224259594>

You are the thunder ⚡ and I am the lightning 🌩

Ay e so. Kitchen

Kitchen, I literally explained the scientific method, that determines proof, and how flat earth actually operates by it, and ball earth doesn’t, and we are the brick walls? I’m sorry, but no.

Sounds great

keep snorting your own crotch fumes guys

doing great

I'll have to go back and look

Here you go, Astral.

The scientific method requires 3 main parts. 1) Observation, 2) Measurement, and 3) Experiment. All we ever observe in real life, is a flat earth. All we ever measure in real life, is zero curvature. All we can ever experiment in real life, where water always seeks to find and maintain it’s level, is a flat earth. Flat earth passes all 3 requirements. Ball earth passes none of them. It’s why flat earth is not a theory, and ball earth is. And why mainstream science, are lying their asses off.

yeah that's not actual evidence

It’s proof.

Thanks.

I have to disagree on your formulation. Observation as #1 is accurate, but then it goes to hypothesis and measurement is a feature of experimentation, not distinct steps.

Go ahead. Form a hypothesis where earth is a ball based on no observation, measurement, or experiment of curve.

I’ll wait.

They don't like to see you winninnnnnn, they wanna see you in a penitentiaryyyyy

You initially observe something and then construct a hypothesis to explain that and have it make testable predictions. You proceed to test those, almost like you are trying to falsify it and as long as it remains unfalsified, it stands, even tho you cannot 'prove' it 100%

If we don’t observe any curve, why would you hypothesize a curve?

🐖