Message from @Deleted User
Discord ID: 607029654951428158
Oh I'm so gonna take that last message out of context
Well for motion there are several ways
Depending on the distance you can use anything from triangulation by parallax to doppler shifts to hubble’s law
Or a combination
You would need a strong telescope, does your average person has the telescope of what NASA uses?
for forces use those measurements and use basic equations of physics to solve for the forces
To get results
You actually don’t and i’ll tell you why
You need a telescope that can track coordinates if you want to be really accurate but you can free hand it for a ball park estimate
But here’s how you can measure movement
I think the hypothesis for gravity is mass attracts mass
who pinged,,,,,,
Use some form of celestial body distance measurement tool like I mentioned before
Avware#3516 LANGUAGE!!!
How would you be able to concur that those 2 objects actually attracted each other by using empirical evidence? You can't get accurate coordinates with your normal telescope
Creeper
Someone pinged me i cant see rn
Yes and I’m explaining how
aww man
@1144oli huh
So now that you know the distance to said body you can plot its position in the sky
you missed a step, observation first
@Umwhat well yeah isn't that what she stated? Gravity accelerates things towards each other.
Perhaps replacing "things" with "mass"
Avware#3516 has been sent to Muted for spamming!
How would you know it's distance from a telescope?
rip
What
you jumped to conclusion with your hypothesis that its gravity by defualt
Hubble’s law is a convenient tool
hi
ah OK
eletrick33#0669 LANGUAGE!!!
what??
I won’t explain Hubble’s law cause you can look it up
you jumped to conclusion with your hypothesis that its gravity by defualt
@Arachidamia
Anyways it’s an easy way to see how far away stuff is
That’s what a hypothesis is
parallax was never found
I’m not jumping to a conclusion
no thats psuedoscience