Message from @1144oli
Discord ID: 607029744936026152
You actually don’t and i’ll tell you why
You need a telescope that can track coordinates if you want to be really accurate but you can free hand it for a ball park estimate
But here’s how you can measure movement
I think the hypothesis for gravity is mass attracts mass
who pinged,,,,,,
Use some form of celestial body distance measurement tool like I mentioned before
Avware#3516 LANGUAGE!!!
How would you be able to concur that those 2 objects actually attracted each other by using empirical evidence? You can't get accurate coordinates with your normal telescope
Creeper
Someone pinged me i cant see rn
Yes and I’m explaining how
aww man
@1144oli huh
ArachidamiaToday at 03:53
Hypothesis: Gravity accelerates things towards each other
So now that you know the distance to said body you can plot its position in the sky
you missed a step, observation first
@Umwhat well yeah isn't that what she stated? Gravity accelerates things towards each other.
Perhaps replacing "things" with "mass"
Avware#3516 has been sent to Muted for spamming!
How would you know it's distance from a telescope?
rip
you jumped to conclusion with your hypothesis that its gravity by defualt
Hubble’s law is a convenient tool
hi
ah OK
eletrick33#0669 LANGUAGE!!!
what??
I won’t explain Hubble’s law cause you can look it up
you jumped to conclusion with your hypothesis that its gravity by defualt
@Arachidamia
Anyways it’s an easy way to see how far away stuff is
That’s what a hypothesis is
parallax was never found
I’m not jumping to a conclusion
no thats psuedoscience
I’m proposing a conclusion to see whether i can prove it
Anyways let me continue
a conclusion comes at the last step
Plot its position with your regular telescope
you dont start of with a conclusion
@Deleted User the force that attracts mass to mass is gravity. What other force would be presented in vacuum other than gravity?
Now wait 6 months and see how far it has moved