Message from @Volvo | 不気味な月間

Discord ID: 607029629877747712


2019-08-03 01:54:46 UTC  

How would you measure the forces and motion of large interacting bodies accurately?

2019-08-03 01:54:52 UTC  

Oh I'm so gonna take that last message out of context

2019-08-03 01:55:03 UTC  

Well for motion there are several ways

2019-08-03 01:55:40 UTC  

Depending on the distance you can use anything from triangulation by parallax to doppler shifts to hubble’s law

2019-08-03 01:55:43 UTC  

Or a combination

2019-08-03 01:56:19 UTC  

You would need a strong telescope, does your average person has the telescope of what NASA uses?

2019-08-03 01:56:32 UTC  

for forces use those measurements and use basic equations of physics to solve for the forces

2019-08-03 01:56:34 UTC  

To get results

2019-08-03 01:56:43 UTC  

You actually don’t and i’ll tell you why

2019-08-03 01:57:31 UTC  

You need a telescope that can track coordinates if you want to be really accurate but you can free hand it for a ball park estimate

2019-08-03 01:57:50 UTC  

But here’s how you can measure movement

2019-08-03 01:58:00 UTC  

I think the hypothesis for gravity is mass attracts mass

2019-08-03 01:58:15 UTC  

who pinged,,,,,,

2019-08-03 01:58:20 UTC  

Use some form of celestial body distance measurement tool like I mentioned before

2019-08-03 01:58:22 UTC  

Avware#3516 LANGUAGE!!!

2019-08-03 01:58:25 UTC  

How would you be able to concur that those 2 objects actually attracted each other by using empirical evidence? You can't get accurate coordinates with your normal telescope

2019-08-03 01:58:38 UTC  

Creeper

2019-08-03 01:58:38 UTC  

Someone pinged me i cant see rn

2019-08-03 01:58:39 UTC  

Yes and I’m explaining how

2019-08-03 01:58:59 UTC  

aww man

2019-08-03 01:59:01 UTC  
2019-08-03 01:59:07 UTC  

ArachidamiaToday at 03:53
Hypothesis: Gravity accelerates things towards each other

2019-08-03 01:59:07 UTC  

So now that you know the distance to said body you can plot its position in the sky

2019-08-03 01:59:15 UTC  

you missed a step, observation first

2019-08-03 01:59:17 UTC  

@Umwhat well yeah isn't that what she stated? Gravity accelerates things towards each other.
Perhaps replacing "things" with "mass"

2019-08-03 01:59:22 UTC  

Avware#3516 has been sent to Muted for spamming!

2019-08-03 01:59:25 UTC  

How would you know it's distance from a telescope?

2019-08-03 01:59:27 UTC  

rip

2019-08-03 01:59:29 UTC  

What

2019-08-03 01:59:35 UTC  

you jumped to conclusion with your hypothesis that its gravity by defualt

2019-08-03 01:59:37 UTC  

Hubble’s law is a convenient tool

2019-08-03 01:59:39 UTC  

hi

2019-08-03 01:59:41 UTC  

ah OK

2019-08-03 01:59:43 UTC  

eletrick33#0669 LANGUAGE!!!

2019-08-03 01:59:48 UTC  

what??

2019-08-03 01:59:49 UTC  

I won’t explain Hubble’s law cause you can look it up

2019-08-03 02:00:02 UTC  

you jumped to conclusion with your hypothesis that its gravity by defualt
@Arachidamia

2019-08-03 02:00:04 UTC  

Anyways it’s an easy way to see how far away stuff is

2019-08-03 02:00:16 UTC  

That’s what a hypothesis is

2019-08-03 02:00:17 UTC  

parallax was never found

2019-08-03 02:00:23 UTC  

I’m not jumping to a conclusion