Blowback spring; no lockup when fired, takedown the slide by pulling out on the trigger guard?

I dont know Sir..i dont know much about guns

I saw one in real life only 1 time

Like the one i put above 🙂

Pretty sure I could clear and taekdown one of those in about 5 seconds.... Familiar design I've shot.

Stoner actions (designer of AR's, M-4/16) are a bit more complex. Rotary dual section bolt with lockup tangs, upper and lower receiver. Bolt blowback into the stock tube, etc. Far fussier in dirty conditions that IMI or AK designs, but more symetrical and precise when kept clean.

Fired all of those too, and maintenance takedowns of them.

Yea..you know a lot about weapons.. I dont know if a police officer at the arms departement knows so many thigs 😄

A kid I trained on AR rifle years ago (friend's nephew) won a best in unit marksmanship award, when he went into our military.

Wow

I need to go work its almost 8AM here. Take care and see you later Loki ^_^ Nice talking to you. I found out a lot of stuff today

Have a good day! 😉

BTW, the 9 mm NATO pistol is 9x19, almost twice the muzzle energy of the short round (also aka .380).

In the Philippines, all of the big shopping malls have security guards with assault rifles at the entrances and no one is bothered, they’ll give directions and such. Weaponry scales with crime rates

In my travels I’ve seen lots of security carrying tactical shotguns as well.

Interesting point Zurich i never thought it like that. Maybe in some Asian countries security may carry those.. and Mexico , Colombia ..

Israel... But there, since the entire country is a genocide fabrication newer than the ICC Crime of Genocide adoption, the very existence of government and its mercenaries is criminal, at the same time as being lawn forcement.

One can tell a lot about countries with cyclic domestic issues by what ammo is being dumped cheap on the world market.

When the Balkans blew up and trashed Yugo exports and a major world infrastructure of lead and cadmium mines used for batteries and hardware plating, 9x19 and 5.56x45 NATO rounds with YKK headstamps that had been prolific and cheap in the USA (imported via Hansen et al), dried up, and Weird Al forgot to include that in his Madonna parody, "Like a Serbian" (bombed for the very first time). But then, IMI rounds replaced them, as at the time, Israel had lots of surplus capacity, until the next cycle when the Zionist Jews4Jenocide just knew more Palestinians needed killing, and the UN process was still rigged to ignore the whole of relevant law.

So Loki you say Israel is an illegitimate State ?

Dude, Shapiro v. Loki debate would be sick

If we can agree on a definition / set of concepts that mean "legitimate" we can debate "illegitimacy" as opposed to that. Or, we could agree on the meaning of illegitimate and debate. In which case the debate would be different.

We can all agree that legitimacy has a moral - thus subjective side. Also we must agree to the extent of which that moral side matters or not.

But my feeling is that Israel wins

Study the history of Zionism, and how it played on the UK ending colonialism plus sympathies post-WW-II, to extend a century of rigged land sales into seizing Palestine by military invasion, in the same year the Crime of Genocide was adopted in international law (largely pushed by sympathy for Jews being victims of Germany's NS-DAP, which was actually more similar than different from Zionists, as supremacist violent gangs seeking exclusive homelands).

Zionism is no different than "America First".

Which isn't necessarily bad.

If one studies international war and related law, it's pretty easy to conclude that most people belong in prison or dead, and that any exemptions are more likely in nations with brutal dictators, and never in participatory democracies where paying taxes or voting meets the (impossible to enforce) legal tests for the Crime of Genocide.

So by that standard, the USA and UK, among others, go down with Israel, or at least everyone acting as military or economic or social allies do.

There are also issues as to whether being a Rome Statute signatory should matter. It's a bit like questioning if the archaic Law of Nations is really realistic in a global telecom, travel and economics village, alongside whether at the nation-state level, if the equivalent of a bank robber has a valid claim to not being violent major criminals if each individual bank robber didn't proactively agree up front to be subject to criminal laws.

Interesting views all around

> Zionism is no different than "America First".
@Yussuki ₪
But it is different, at least in terms of historic development of international law, and formation by crimes at the time of the country's origin. The US Trail of Tears for Indian tribes was a lot like the century of rigged land sales in Palestine that enabled the 1950's war based grab for the remainder, but that predates any such modern law. The entire Doctrine of Discovery based colonialism of most of Africa and parts of the Americas and Asia was a human rights scam and genocide competition among at least 7 European powers, but that's a bygone era of history now.

Zionism (and actions it drove) differ mainly in terms of its genocide scams falling into the period of modern world class crimes, where many political and military allies had assumed obligations to prevent that.

I believe, the more we go back into History, we will probably reach the Cambrian Explosion. However, we can agree that from a legal perspective, Israel is a legitimate State ?

It's legitimacy is far beyond it's mere "Right to exist" as it has been first proposed. We can agree on this ?

Relevant to that ICC/UN framework, Israel;s existence being a fraud and criminal isn't subjective. It was primarily based on violent crimes at the time of land seizure and formation.

There are major issues with how that body of law works, and now after generations of Israelis, what can be done about it. But, that history cannot be undone.

A claim of Zionists is that Jews have some claim to Palestine, as they're Jews, and Jews are entitled arrogant pieces of shit. On that basis, why didn't we help Hitler clean up that crime problem? Those same Zionists were on record claiming it'd be worth the deaths of half of Jews worldwide, if they could steal Palestine as Zion. Lots of respect for more peaceful fellow Jews there, eh?

And with the UN, process was rigged to exclude Palestine from having a seat to timely protest, sort of like how Somalia during civil wars was excluded from process to demand to not be used as Asia's HazMat dump, making cheap stuff for the US and EU.

Ok so you say : 1. The existence of Israel is based on fraud // and 2. Israel should have a moral obligation to compensate it.

1. Which is the fraud?

2. What compensations you see fit ?

To my knowledge, the contesters of Israel have dubious undemocratic governments and are very much associated with terrorism and lack of human rights: Yemen, Kuweit, Sudan, Somalia, etc. However, to my knowledge, their views are not based on international consensus. Their claims are not shared by the world leading states. Also , it is not in their power to denounce internationally agreed treatis and conventions. For example, if Denmark and Isral sign a bilateral treaty, it's not Yemen's business to denounce it.

In my opinion the existence of Israel is very beneficial for World Peace and Equilibrium in the Middle East. Had it not been for Israel, we would have had a lot more suicide bombers.

In some cases, the ends justify the means. For example, if the US wouldn't have waged war against Irak (remember the inexistent WMD), we would have had a Huge Iran , whose ayatollah would control 1/6th of the world economy. Sometimes, you need to break some eggs to make an omlette.

You would have had a Mega Terrorist State: Iran + Irak + Afghanistan + Jordan + Syria + Palestine + Qatar + Yemen + Saudi Arabia = World Dynamite Barrel.

I think he describes the fraud as being Israeli genocide of Palestinians culminating in the Zionist movement, the culmination occurring the same year as the institution of the law against genocide.

Luckily, the Bush ppl understood that. Otherwise we wouldn't stay and talk on Discord. And those sacrifices that have been made will give us a century of relative peace.

Like you say zino, it’s unclear what Loki wants as reparations from Israel