Only the army used them in foreign operations

Yes they are forbiden for an individual

How about other semi or bolt rifles, sidearms, or shotguns?

An individual can only wear a 9mm pistol if he is a cop or lawyer, or prosecuter

If he wants, because most of them dont wear a gun anyway

Shotguns are prohibited. Only hunting rifles for hunting under strict supervision is possible, but few people have them

In fact less than 0.5% of the population owns a gun (with real bullets or compressed air) And excluding police officers. Because not all police officers are armed. Very few of them are armed

Whereas in the USA, roughly a third of adults own a bit over an average of 3 firearms each. Air rifles and such don't count.

Like 80% of the cops wearing guns in Romania use this pistol from 1974.. And like 5% of all cops actually have guns. The rest of 20% have that beretta.

Outside black markets driven crime, largely based on drug policies, there's not much criminal use of arms. Politicians like higher crime rates so long as most voters don't realize the assholes in office promising to protect them, actually caused most of the problem.

Oh i see.

Is that a 9x17 (kurz) Walther PPK loose copy?

It is called "The Carpathian Pistol" - The Carpathians are a chain of mountains in Romania

Here it is

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pistol_Carpa%C8%9Bi_Md._1974

Blowback spring; no lockup when fired, takedown the slide by pulling out on the trigger guard?

I dont know Sir..i dont know much about guns

I saw one in real life only 1 time

Like the one i put above 🙂

Pretty sure I could clear and taekdown one of those in about 5 seconds.... Familiar design I've shot.

Stoner actions (designer of AR's, M-4/16) are a bit more complex. Rotary dual section bolt with lockup tangs, upper and lower receiver. Bolt blowback into the stock tube, etc. Far fussier in dirty conditions that IMI or AK designs, but more symetrical and precise when kept clean.

Fired all of those too, and maintenance takedowns of them.

Yea..you know a lot about weapons.. I dont know if a police officer at the arms departement knows so many thigs 😄

A kid I trained on AR rifle years ago (friend's nephew) won a best in unit marksmanship award, when he went into our military.

Wow

I need to go work its almost 8AM here. Take care and see you later Loki ^_^ Nice talking to you. I found out a lot of stuff today

Have a good day! 😉

BTW, the 9 mm NATO pistol is 9x19, almost twice the muzzle energy of the short round (also aka .380).

In the Philippines, all of the big shopping malls have security guards with assault rifles at the entrances and no one is bothered, they’ll give directions and such. Weaponry scales with crime rates

In my travels I’ve seen lots of security carrying tactical shotguns as well.

Interesting point Zurich i never thought it like that. Maybe in some Asian countries security may carry those.. and Mexico , Colombia ..

Israel... But there, since the entire country is a genocide fabrication newer than the ICC Crime of Genocide adoption, the very existence of government and its mercenaries is criminal, at the same time as being lawn forcement.

One can tell a lot about countries with cyclic domestic issues by what ammo is being dumped cheap on the world market.

When the Balkans blew up and trashed Yugo exports and a major world infrastructure of lead and cadmium mines used for batteries and hardware plating, 9x19 and 5.56x45 NATO rounds with YKK headstamps that had been prolific and cheap in the USA (imported via Hansen et al), dried up, and Weird Al forgot to include that in his Madonna parody, "Like a Serbian" (bombed for the very first time). But then, IMI rounds replaced them, as at the time, Israel had lots of surplus capacity, until the next cycle when the Zionist Jews4Jenocide just knew more Palestinians needed killing, and the UN process was still rigged to ignore the whole of relevant law.

So Loki you say Israel is an illegitimate State ?

Dude, Shapiro v. Loki debate would be sick

If we can agree on a definition / set of concepts that mean "legitimate" we can debate "illegitimacy" as opposed to that. Or, we could agree on the meaning of illegitimate and debate. In which case the debate would be different.

We can all agree that legitimacy has a moral - thus subjective side. Also we must agree to the extent of which that moral side matters or not.

But my feeling is that Israel wins

Study the history of Zionism, and how it played on the UK ending colonialism plus sympathies post-WW-II, to extend a century of rigged land sales into seizing Palestine by military invasion, in the same year the Crime of Genocide was adopted in international law (largely pushed by sympathy for Jews being victims of Germany's NS-DAP, which was actually more similar than different from Zionists, as supremacist violent gangs seeking exclusive homelands).

Zionism is no different than "America First".

Which isn't necessarily bad.

If one studies international war and related law, it's pretty easy to conclude that most people belong in prison or dead, and that any exemptions are more likely in nations with brutal dictators, and never in participatory democracies where paying taxes or voting meets the (impossible to enforce) legal tests for the Crime of Genocide.

So by that standard, the USA and UK, among others, go down with Israel, or at least everyone acting as military or economic or social allies do.

There are also issues as to whether being a Rome Statute signatory should matter. It's a bit like questioning if the archaic Law of Nations is really realistic in a global telecom, travel and economics village, alongside whether at the nation-state level, if the equivalent of a bank robber has a valid claim to not being violent major criminals if each individual bank robber didn't proactively agree up front to be subject to criminal laws.