Message from @Yussuki ₪

Discord ID: 757760165817745501


2020-09-22 00:21:11 UTC  

Circumcision is usefull in certain situations.

2020-09-22 00:21:13 UTC  

hahahah

2020-09-22 00:21:45 UTC  

*Skin graft

2020-09-22 00:22:14 UTC  

So the foreskin was used to help people suffering from burns

2020-09-22 00:22:20 UTC  

Primary goal in life is to be a porn hub category!

2020-09-22 00:22:43 UTC  

😂

2020-09-22 00:24:30 UTC  

uncircumcision with skin grafts?

2020-09-22 00:24:51 UTC  

I dontknow what the english word is

2020-09-22 00:25:04 UTC  

Used that skin to cover burned parts of the patients

2020-09-22 00:25:05 UTC  

what's the romanian word?

2020-09-22 00:25:09 UTC  

grefe

2020-09-22 00:25:12 UTC  

yeah graft

2020-09-22 00:25:12 UTC  

Grefe de piele

2020-09-22 00:25:17 UTC  

skin graft

2020-09-22 00:25:58 UTC  

lmao

2020-09-22 00:26:19 UTC  

Also desensibilisation of the penis, lead to a less pleasurable sexual act. Therefore the husband would be more loial to his wife and obey social order.

2020-09-22 00:26:29 UTC  

(work more)

2020-09-22 00:26:53 UTC  

Older society worked different

2020-09-22 00:27:57 UTC  

Atheists have no basis for morality. Its just hedonism and pseudo-Christian platitudes like "well-being".

2020-09-22 00:28:22 UTC  

Hm..i dont agree entirely..

2020-09-22 00:29:07 UTC  

Id say that an atheist can makehis own moral base. Since even chimps have one

2020-09-22 00:29:21 UTC  

Pain and loss are a good basis for morality

2020-09-22 00:30:04 UTC  

@Baal Diablo pain and loss presuppose a standard by which there's some bodily integrity and something which makes something whole

2020-09-22 00:33:36 UTC  

could you rephrase?

2020-09-22 00:46:04 UTC  

But before Bro came

2020-09-22 00:46:10 UTC  

What were you talking about?

2020-09-22 00:46:17 UTC  

Relating to morality?

2020-09-22 01:16:55 UTC  

Reciprocity will generate monopoly

2020-09-22 01:17:17 UTC  

=> Resources will be unequally distributed. More social disparity

2020-09-22 01:19:37 UTC  

Isn’t that the same as the foundations for true democracy? Everyone votes for their best interest = maximized benefit AND self-correcting as interests change and performance changes opinion on who will serve the interest.

2020-09-22 01:21:33 UTC  

In Switzerland there is a democracy. People voted against their own interest when they wanted to raise the pensions. The didn't want it because they put a future interest - not having inflation - above the immediat interest

2020-09-22 01:23:08 UTC  

1. That would still be their interest, just long term
2. I meant true democracy (which only exists in theory)

2020-09-22 01:23:54 UTC  

Democracy is when 2 wolves and 1 sheep vote on dinner? 😄

2020-09-22 01:24:14 UTC  

A smart wolf would ally with the ship.

2020-09-22 01:24:31 UTC  

Yes. Theoretically. Maximizes utility. 🙃

2020-09-22 01:26:18 UTC  

But once the sheep is gone, what do they have tomorrow? 🙂 so one smart wolf may vote to not eat the sheep, let it graze grass, provide income to other wolves with by-products, and look for 100000s of birds to eat 🙂

2020-09-22 01:27:03 UTC  

Great argument. Nice talk to you guys ill have to go its 4:27 AM ZZzz take care

2020-09-22 01:27:15 UTC  

Night

2020-09-22 01:27:23 UTC  

Always a pleasure to have you here

2020-09-22 06:17:48 UTC  

anyone around?