Message from @JonJon

Discord ID: 513103345389666334


2018-11-16 20:27:50 UTC  

.

2018-11-16 20:35:07 UTC  

Rep. Eric swollowswell just slrt of threatened us nukes. Should he be in office?!

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/513089657634947113/image.png

2018-11-16 20:37:02 UTC  

People advocating for war either haven't been or won't be going.

2018-11-16 20:38:10 UTC  

We need our military here at home

2018-11-16 20:39:45 UTC  

I do not want war anywhere. I do want our military protecting we the people from our enemies.

2018-11-16 20:41:11 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/513091185900781608/image0.jpg

2018-11-16 20:43:29 UTC  

https://files.catbox.moe/g66pvy.png

2018-11-16 21:06:32 UTC  

This was from the Chan. Anon asking what is it with the purple tie. After the LV shooting Potus wore a purple tie. Ole who is a European, that talked frequently about False Flags in Europe and how the elites always give people clues, pointed out all sorts of creepy occult Freemason stuff about The Vegas shooting. He pointed out all the purple the Clinton “resistance” were wearing and then he pointed out Potus and his purple tie. This was before Q and I just got furious, as there were all kinds of shills that said Potus were on the side of the Clintons, and this all was a game on us. I wrote Potus and told him purple was an unbecoming color and he should wear red. Red is a much better color for him. After I sent that letter he rarely wore purple, but mostly wore red. He listens. I do not know why he is wearing purple now, but I think he wore purple after the Vegas shooting to tell the Cabal he was resisting them. Now? Maybe, Ready for payback for Vegas?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/513097567509282816/image0.jpg

2018-11-16 21:07:44 UTC  

Wrong picture...purple tie. Ready for payback for Vegas?

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/513097865325969416/image0.jpg

2018-11-16 21:16:33 UTC  

https://files.catbox.moe/o14ygs.png

2018-11-16 21:23:25 UTC  

How would that judge react if Acosta acted belligerent in his courtroom, won't stop talking, or challenged him with lectures? 🤔

2018-11-16 21:27:06 UTC  

@dream catcher Interesting analysis. Remember, Vegas started the war and SA +++ was corrected shortly after. Doubt it's a vengeance thing. May have significance but a different angle perhaps.

2018-11-16 21:39:52 UTC  

WTH???

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/435869520998170624/513105952703250433/Screen_Shot_2018-11-16_at_4.35.27_PM.png

2018-11-16 21:52:20 UTC  

Robert Mueller and His Ilk Are About to Commit a Massive Crime; Will You Let Them Get Away With It? https://larouchepac.com/20181116/robert-mueller-and-his-ilk-are-about-commit-massive-crime-will-you-let-them-get-away-it#.W-87tRjuDTc.twitter

2018-11-16 21:58:05 UTC  

@here Please join me in the prescreening voice room to PARTICIPATE in Freedom Rings with Pamphlet and 412 now. You must be at least E-1 and bring something interesting to discuss. See you there.

2018-11-16 21:59:08 UTC  

BBN: The new narrative seems to be If Mays Deal isn't accepted then no BREXIT at all. Liam Fox: "The worst outcome would be no Brexit at all" International trade secretary says it would be "dangerous" for democracy if MPs vote down the #Brexit deal

2018-11-16 22:03:33 UTC  

The UK minister lied. The hard BREXIT come when time is up, as they offically triggered the article 50 of the Treaty of the European Union on March 2017.
Withdrawal from the European Union is the legal and political process whereby an EU member state ceases to be a member of the Union. Under Article 50 of the Treaty on European Union (TEU), "Any Member State may decide to withdraw from the Union in accordance with its own constitutional requirements".
No member state has as of yet withdrawn from the EU (or the EC); however, the Government of the United Kingdom  has triggered Article 50 to begin the UK's withdrawal from the EU in March 2017 following a referendum, and the withdrawal is scheduled to occur on 29 March 2019.

2018-11-16 22:05:04 UTC  

HAPPENING NOW: Stacey Abrams is set to talk about the governor's race for the first time since Election Day. LIVE coverage RIGHT NOW on Channel 2 Action News. (DETAILS - 2wsb.tv/2PWUQHh)

2018-11-16 22:05:44 UTC  

ATLANTA - For the first time in nine days, we are going to hear from Democratic candidate Stacey Abrams about her fight in the election for governor.

Abrams has called for a news conference at 5 p.m., which is also the deadline a judge has set for the state to certify the election.

The news release said she will be delivering brief remarks at that time.

2018-11-16 22:06:59 UTC  

HAPPENING NOW: Democratic Gubernatorial nominee Stacey Abrams is speaking about her campaign's latest efforts as the state prepares to certify votes.

MORE: https://bit.ly/2qP11yE

2018-11-16 22:07:20 UTC  

Stacey Abrams' team prepares push for new vote

2018-11-16 22:07:36 UTC  

ATLANTA (AP) - Stacey Abrams' campaign and legal team is preparing an unprecedented legal challenge in the unresolved Georgia governor's race that could leave the state's Supreme Court deciding whether to force another round of voting.

2018-11-16 22:07:54 UTC  

The Democrat's longshot strategy relies on a statute that's never been used in such a high-stakes contest. It is being discussed as Georgia elections officials appear to be on the cusp of certifying Republican Brian Kemp as the winner of a bitterly fought campaign that's been marred by charges of electoral malfeasance.

Top Abrams advisers outlined her prospective case to The Associated Press, stressing that the Democratic candidate hasn't finalized a decision about whether to proceed once state officials certify Kemp as the victor. That could happen as early as Friday evening.

Allegra Lawrence-Hardy, Abrams' campaign chairwoman, is overseeing a team of almost three-dozen lawyers who in the coming days will draft the petition, along with a ream of affidavits from voters and would-be voters who say they were disenfranchised. Abrams would then decide whether to go to court under a provision of Georgia election law that allows losing candidates to challenge results based on "misconduct, fraud or irregularities ... sufficient to change or place in doubt the results."

The legal team is "considering all options," Lawrence-Hardy said, including federal court remedies. But the state challenge is the most drastic. And some Democratic legal observers note Abrams would be dependent on statutes that set a high bar for the court to intervene.

2018-11-16 22:08:13 UTC  

She already faces a narrow path to the governor's mansion. Unofficial returns show Kemp with about 50.2 percent of more than 3.9 million votes. That puts him about 18,000 votes above the threshold required to win by a majority and avoid a Dec. 4 runoff. The Associated Press is not calling the race until state officials certify the results.

Related Headlines
Gwinnett County certifies election
Bourdeaux asks more absentee ballots to count
Bourdeaux files suit to delay certifying election
Recount ordered for Georgia House District 37 race
Republicans, Democrats countersue over Gov. race
Abrams would assert that enough irregularities occurred to raise the possibility that at least 18,000 Georgians either had their ballots thrown out or were not allowed to vote.

Lawrence-Hardy told the AP that Abrams will weigh legal considerations alongside her belief that many of her backers - particularly minority and poorer voters who don't regularly go to the polls - heeded her call to participate and ran into barriers.

"These stories to me are such that they have to be addressed," said Lawrence-Hardy, who was among the army of lawyers who worked on the Bush v. Gore presidential election dispute in 2000. "It's just a much bigger responsibility. I feel like our mandate has blossomed. ... Maybe this is our moment."