Sar

Discord ID: 312405483149459457


1,268 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/13 | Next

"Let's show them doxing isn't wrong by doxing them" everyone spam should be instant ban

2018-05-22 21:04:08 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

you're saying giants were the early experiments to create alien-human hybrids that could blend in with the human race?

2018-06-04 16:50:20 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

What's the deal with Tucson? People keep bringing it up

2018-06-08 20:41:55 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

will people ever stop PINGING EVERYONE

2018-06-08 20:42:04 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

it should be an instant ban

2018-06-12 19:27:25 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

enough pingspam

2018-06-12 19:27:30 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

grow up

2018-06-12 19:31:25 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

stop pinging everyone

2018-06-12 19:32:54 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

it takes two to tango

2018-06-12 19:32:59 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

ban everyone who pings everyone

2018-06-12 19:33:20 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

normal people who aren't shills would ignore shills

2018-06-12 19:38:05 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

if people are using mod powers to erase criticism of Holly, they should be using that to kick pingspammers and erase nonsense about people being bots

2018-06-12 19:38:44 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

oh my god who cares

2018-06-25 03:13:24 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

If there is anyone who a endure sound doctrine here, leave me a DM.

2018-06-25 20:43:05 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

@RadixVerum Root of truth would be Radix Veri

2018-06-25 20:57:14 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

@Ark of Info [GER] Very few people are tuned into the wavelength he's operating on.

2018-06-25 20:57:54 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

Trump's using the Bible as a code

2018-06-25 20:58:13 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

You don't see it unless you've studied the Bible inside and out

2018-06-25 20:58:26 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

And if so, you know to keep your mouth shut

2018-06-25 21:03:35 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

@everyone Can any endure sound doctrine?

2018-06-25 21:05:37 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

What is the true gospel?

2018-06-25 21:09:05 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

Every church claims they believe the Bible. Would Paul have agreed with every church's doctrine?

2018-06-25 21:09:15 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

What is the false gospel? What is the doctrine of devils?

2018-06-25 21:09:40 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

Who would Paul say is right?

2018-06-26 01:39:02 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

That doesn't tell me anything. Might as well paste john 3:16

2018-06-26 01:41:52 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

every clause the Nicene Creed is sourced in a different verse of scripture, and even that isn't "the good news". What is the real good news?

2018-06-26 01:42:09 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance

2018-06-27 02:35:54 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/454466252509937685/461358985073917952/26165808_1991700907737063_1541075591666916531_n.jpg

2018-06-27 02:37:28 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

Muslims can't show Jesus's face

2018-06-27 02:41:00 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

Image search "justin trudeau wearing cross " 0 results

2018-06-27 04:37:02 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

NeEleman means the hidden one

2018-06-27 04:38:46 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

You guys still distracting with a stupid plane?

2018-06-27 04:39:08 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #psb-voice-content]  

Take the plane to plane chat

2018-07-10 15:30:32 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

@retiredDep Only kohanim are allowed to say birkat kohanim

2018-07-10 15:33:47 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

And if you say birchat haTorah without reciting Torah or the complete me'ein shalosh without eating the 5 grains, drinking wine, and eating the 7 species, you're uttering a bracha leVatalah

2018-07-10 19:26:32 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

@retiredDep Rabbis are not kohanim, they're not allowed to say birkat kohanim. Please source this statement.

2018-07-10 19:27:55 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

Consider that one's evil inclination can lead one to manners of service that are brazen, all the while he's convinced these impulses are from the side of holiness.

2018-07-10 19:28:45 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

Thinking that everyone should be able to say birkat kohanim was the very contention of the rebels in the disputation of Korach.

2018-07-10 19:30:50 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #the-chapel-text]  

btw A+++ for knowing what I'm even talking about

2018-07-13 16:06:38 UTC [Patriots' Soapbox #call-ins-text-channel]  

"At press time, the Twitter purge [of fake accounts] had cost Obama 2,346,119 followers, or more than two percent of his audience on the site, with President Trump losing 325,038 followers so far, a 0.7-percent decrease."

Is their own understanding based on following their heart?

And Satan plants impulses in what, if not the heart?

That the average person is not pure in heart, like I said. It sounds like you agree.

Not because they believe in the Bible or Christ but because being pure in heart is the level of completely righteous/saint

Someone who is righteous but not completely righteous still has evil thoughts but recognizes them as such, and they don't hold any sway over him

The concept of sainthood is an excuse to stay evil? What do you mean?

@Hake, how does the concept of someone who is incompletely righteous in the sense that their heart still gives them impure thoughts, but they hold no sway over him, "an excuse to stay evil"?

"lean not on your own understanding" means follow the tradition passed down with the Bible instead of your own imaginings. It's the same thing as "Go to the priests and judges that will be in your generation" or "Listen to the Pharisees for they sit in Moses' seat".

"I honestly donโ€™t know if we should have doctrine discussions" is an excuse not to pursue truth. It's up to the individual to be open to changing their positions.

The concept of Messiah is in every religion

Messiah is the concept that all of our souls have, at their highest level, no separation from each other nor from God

If you don't follow the Bible, and I follow the Bible, we're operating under different frameworks

You shouldn't be debating what the Bible says if you don't follow it

I follow the tradition that was passed down, not my own understanding. I offer no novel interpretations of my own.

You don't trust the codex but you claim that the decoder ring that was given with the codex is faulty? You don't accept the codex nevermind the ring.

Name one interpretation of the Bible I've offered that I produced from my own imagination

What place does an idolator have arguing what is true doctrine and what is heretical?

I have said nothing about myself except, when pressed by you, to say it's strongly implied that I have not achieved theosis. And somehow this is touting myself as an intellectual?

So then the Bible is not self-consistent?

If the Bible isn't self-consistent, how can one make any arguments based on the Bible that "intellect, knowledge, and judgment" are lies.

If Hake doesn't follow the Bible and PPF doesn't know whether the Bible is self-consistent, how is it possible to advance any opinion on doctrine

You would have to go back and argue whether the Bible is reliable, self-consistent, etc.

If we don't agree on what the color Red is we can't argue whether something is Red

This isn't a life counseling chat, this is doctrinal discussion chat

It seems to you that way based on what?

Haven't you agreed the heart is deceitful?

Preaching the true gospel and countering the doctrine of demons does not make me feel good about myself

It is a chore and not appreciated by anyone

What He meant was that the hypocrites receive their reward in this world, borrowed against the next

"If the home is worthy, let your peace rest on it; if it is not, let your peace return to you. And if anyone will not welcome you or heed your words, shake the dust off your feet when you leave that home or town. Truly I tell you, it will be more bearable for Sodom and Gomorrah on the day of judgment than for that town." This is the work.

If the admins tolerate me, they tolerate me. When they stop, I move on to some other group ruled over by some other admins.

I have not taken the ass of any one of ye, nor have I wronged any one of ye. Heaven forefend I should derive any benefit from speaking out.

"Preach the word; be prepared in season and out of season; reprove, rebuke, and encourage with every form of patient instruction" is not mere vanity

Do you honestly think you wouldn't have said the same thing to Jesus Himself? "Look at this guy trying to exalt his vast intellect over everyone."

Merely for responding to heresy with truth

They don't say God, they use different names that mean different things.

The question is ill-defined. What's usually translated as God in English is Elohim, which is God as manifest in Creation and/or acting with attribute of judgment.

But typically if someone is into Eastern religions, whose inner aspects are on the outside, their conception of God is the panentheistic God, the All, Brahman

Do you mean accessing? Indexing is a means of optimization.

Are you asking what I consider my self? I don't understand the question.

How Paul answered when followers of Apollo accused him of "relying on his own understanding": When one says, โ€œI am of Paul,โ€ and another, โ€œI am of Apollos,โ€ are you not mere men? What then is Apollos? And what is Paul? Servants through whom you believed, even as the Lord gave opportunity to each one.

Acts 6:13, when they accused Stephen of "relying on his own understanding": They presented *false* witnesses who said, โ€œThis man never stops speaking against this holy place and against the Law. For we have heard him say that Jesus of Nazareth will destroy this place and change the customs that Moses handed down to us.โ€

If they were *false* witnesses, then Stephen must have spoken *for* the Law, *for* Jerusalem, and *for* the traditions the Moses handed down.

Not based on his own understanding; based on the tradition that Moses received from the mouth of the Lord.

1,268 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/13 | Next