@HH No

Listen to Jocko

it was to just prove my point

tfw no jewish gf

"change my state of mind love so hard to find"

@HH But your point is shit and your example doesn't prove it

badass marine seal jocko willink

@Deleted User

we must secure the existence of our women and a future for white women to be cunts and fuck niggers

netanyahu hahaha

😂😂😂

😍😍😍

AHAHAHA KHAMEINI

3%

Loserrr

Thanks I’m showing it to my friend

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wlb-HWpDDx0

this but unironically

@HH Because your asking me to make a prudential judgement over whether or not we should kill the children despite their innocence because they have lesser ability to affect good works. Or whether we should kill the doctor because children are more innocent and this is more just despite the ability to do good acts.

@HH This I say is a false dilemma, neither answer is wrong. There are good reasons to extend mercy to either group.

This does not obviously prove anything related to what is and isn't good and what human nature is and is not

@Punished Scaredd how old is the tweet

People see children as survival of the species, it has nothing to do with thier innocence

@HH False

but yes, that's a pretty good sumation of the question, but the fact that there's even a second of though is my entire point

the answer is save the guy that will save 20 more tommorow

the children die without even a second to think about it

No there is no obviously correct decision

looking for decent looking keto meals is fucking depressing

if the doctor will save 20 more lives tommorow then what debate is there?

does any of this look fucking good?

btfo

@HH The debate is whether we value more the relative innocence of children or do we value more good works of the doctor

Yes, and i say to you innocence isn't real

Well I agree

that's why I said *relative innocence*

the reason they're releatively innocent is they haven't lived long enough yet to sin