I could argue said points are legitimate

Of course you can argue that it has a legitimate position, but you don't allow the opposition the opportunity to argue against it

my general pattern of typing involves short fragments, which when combined make a full sentence

or point

or something to that effect

If that's what you're complaining about...?

If I take issue to something, I'll try to refute it point by point

Well from what I understand in my genetics course is that 1) many traits are multifactorial, those that arent or rather a multitude fo traits that combine together to form a clinical picture are associations and these go on to syndromes in the case of defects. Syndromes are genetic however their cause is multifactorial. Much like IQ has a genetic range, most people will land in the average and I mean the VAST majority. Those that dont have either a medical issue or alternatively a gift. If you reach your genetic potential for IQ that is the enviormental factors as well as factors of your development matter. However there is marked variation between populations that cna be seen by country averages, the result is that we can then extrapolate racial differences as well as well as differences in "styles" of thought through other tests etc. Its not brutally deterministic but there is a reason country X looks like it does and country Z looks the way it does. Most often it is due to the peope inside the country, rarely is it due to people outside the country. (This has been recently shifted as well).

Essentially genes matter, there will be differences, and basically the racial IQ debate is somewhat pointless since it does exist, however what matters is rather now the science of basically populations.

Can X live with Y in peace, under what circumstances generally speaking we have the answer but because of some false virtues we are afraid to say otherwise because we are afraid of devaluing someones life, making them subhuman when thats not whats happening at all. And all debates centered around population differences need to avoid this like the plague otherwise we jump into the realm of opinion and some really wonky mental gymnastics rather than truth.

@The American Nationalist MUSLIMS ARE THE SIMPTON!!JEWS ARE THE CAUSE!!!!

<@&452955169219543040> stupid

@everyone Daily Question 🔖

Will the U.S grow faster than China, ever for the future? Will China permanently or only temporarily surpass the U.S economically?

Don't know

the US can't grow faster currently

idk

when china catches up GDP wise maybe

China will grow faster, then crash

Chinas economy has nearly unlimited slave labour, they’ll grow

I don't think they will ever actually surpass the us

China's GNP is already several trillion greater than the US. However, their GDP is starting to smooth out, which also bears in it now having some "growing pains".

The chinese as a people are getting older

The same problem europe is having will happen to china in the next 10-15 years

U.s is gonna grow but not at the same rate. I can imagine the US going at a more consistent rate. China will probably fluctuate.

It really depends on how Trump does in this trade war. If Trump can exploit the vulnerabilities in the Chinese economy then China will crash and have a tough time trying to recover

China's going to pass the US

China has the option of just letting their old die though

in terms of GDP

The US population is aging too

most populations are

Sans immigrants

Not to neglect migrants, of course, though with xenophobic, isolationist attitudes...

Well, the US is definitely going to be aging

yeah, the US's tfr is 1.9

Not terrible, but below replacement by a fair bit

to be fair, China has a lower tfr, but that's artificial

Hello.

China will surpass the United States

China will surpass the US simply because they are not a democracy and can implement reforms faster to face long term problems, like the fertility rate.
To to be fair the male/female ratio in China is going to cause some problems in the future

The cost of that is the second the government becomes weak or stops producing results everything collapses @名被盜

They can’t use the militaristic strategy since they have a massive population and working class

Militarism isn't really enough to dominate the world anyways