Message from @shajam
Discord ID: 500053381872746497
The error is not your position, it's how you expect it to be debated and your disingenuous standard
I don't really see how the standard is disingenuous
I'd accept any counterpoint really
I'm just using the source out of convenience
you could argue the source contains some illegitimate points
I could argue said points are legitimate
Of course you can argue that it has a legitimate position, but you don't allow the opposition the opportunity to argue against it
my general pattern of typing involves short fragments, which when combined make a full sentence
or point
or something to that effect
If that's what you're complaining about...?
If I take issue to something, I'll try to refute it point by point
Well from what I understand in my genetics course is that 1) many traits are multifactorial, those that arent or rather a multitude fo traits that combine together to form a clinical picture are associations and these go on to syndromes in the case of defects. Syndromes are genetic however their cause is multifactorial. Much like IQ has a genetic range, most people will land in the average and I mean the VAST majority. Those that dont have either a medical issue or alternatively a gift. If you reach your genetic potential for IQ that is the enviormental factors as well as factors of your development matter. However there is marked variation between populations that cna be seen by country averages, the result is that we can then extrapolate racial differences as well as well as differences in "styles" of thought through other tests etc. Its not brutally deterministic but there is a reason country X looks like it does and country Z looks the way it does. Most often it is due to the peope inside the country, rarely is it due to people outside the country. (This has been recently shifted as well).
Essentially genes matter, there will be differences, and basically the racial IQ debate is somewhat pointless since it does exist, however what matters is rather now the science of basically populations.
Can X live with Y in peace, under what circumstances generally speaking we have the answer but because of some false virtues we are afraid to say otherwise because we are afraid of devaluing someones life, making them subhuman when thats not whats happening at all. And all debates centered around population differences need to avoid this like the plague otherwise we jump into the realm of opinion and some really wonky mental gymnastics rather than truth.
@The American Nationalist MUSLIMS ARE THE SIMPTON!!JEWS ARE THE CAUSE!!!!
<@&452955169219543040> stupid
@everyone Daily Question 🔖
Will the U.S grow faster than China, ever for the future? Will China permanently or only temporarily surpass the U.S economically?
Don't know
the US can't grow faster currently
idk
China will grow faster, then crash
Chinas economy has nearly unlimited slave labour, they’ll grow
I don't think they will ever actually surpass the us
China's GNP is already several trillion greater than the US. However, their GDP is starting to smooth out, which also bears in it now having some "growing pains".
The chinese as a people are getting older
The same problem europe is having will happen to china in the next 10-15 years
U.s is gonna grow but not at the same rate. I can imagine the US going at a more consistent rate. China will probably fluctuate.
It really depends on how Trump does in this trade war. If Trump can exploit the vulnerabilities in the Chinese economy then China will crash and have a tough time trying to recover
China's going to pass the US
China has the option of just letting their old die though
in terms of GDP
The US population is aging too
most populations are
Sans immigrants
Not to neglect migrants, of course, though with xenophobic, isolationist attitudes...
Well, the US is definitely going to be aging
yeah, the US's tfr is 1.9
Not terrible, but below replacement by a fair bit
to be fair, China has a lower tfr, but that's artificial
Hello.