Message from @Draco
Discord ID: 517365564549890048
because theres no 100% shariah as it used to be back then
@Muhammad Al-Tajir shariah law allows the impregnating of children aged 9
Go on
they just pay jizya and thats it. if a muslim kills theirs the muslim will be executed
Read my comment for perhaps more clarity. It's moreso the abandoning of Truths that may be destabilizing that leads to despotic tendency and a lack of growth, with the benefit of regional stability of culture
@Doctor Anon sources pls
Several examples, like death for apostasy. Also, in Islam, there is virtually no possibility of a guaranteed propagation of religion.
Muslim men have sexual rights to any woman/girl not wearing the Hijab (see Taharrush).
there is no death for apostasy. but there is death for the apostate who goes against the state by attacking it
@Doctor Anon what the hell is taharrush
btw thats egypts ruling
@Muhammad Al-Tajir The line that separates that has been quite shaky.
show me where it says so in the sharia
@Doctor Anon That is not true
@Draco basically practice any religion you want. dont harm others
Woah woah
Hi
Wtf is going on here
and just you know. just dont go attacking the state or you'll be attacked as a result. thats our shariah
its not "kill them wherever you see them" like some dude who obv hasnt read the seerah of the prophet saws
@Draco so apostating is equal to attacking the state?is that what you mean?
Lol. No. Would preaching against Islam be ok in 100% Sharia state?
hmm. good question
probably not. it would get you imprisoned but probably not killed
Well, then that is bad. Because that means that the only way to propagate another religion, which may be anti-degeneracy as well is to take care not to attack established religion, which is a dicey territory.
Which means, the stability of society becomes directly tied to Islam and it is all or nothing package
laws only shariah
if it doesnt exist in qur'an and sunnah we will see among the righteous medieval scholars
which actually do answer most of our daily questions
it goes to fiqh
ijma and qiyas
on a thing that cannot be answered via quran and sunnah
but the prophets companions opinion also count before that
and lastly it only applies to me
because im closer to the maliki school of thought
the practice of the people of medina
and the schools of thought are all right. they dont depart and divide people over the aqeedah
>"muhammed"
>white
oh please
Do they change their names or something?
lmfao no
im brown nigger as fuck