Message from @DeepLove
Discord ID: 517364738838102016
^
I hear older generations did the same thing
It's been similar probably since the 60s
the only real thing that became more commonly widespread to my knowledge is drugs over the last few decades
otherwise everything is pretty much the same
Condoms and stuff like that wasn't that widespread before the 50s or 60s so people had less reckless sex
Alcohol has been missused in this country for longer than there is written sources
The difference is that older generations were chastised.
The problem with Islam is it is all or nothing package. @Muhammad Al-Tajir
There are good reasons to not be Muslims, which means you have to punish good people to establish order.
punish good people to establish order. do you mean fornication or gay sex?
in pauls writing it says rulers are only bad for bad people
but not for good people????
Punishing people for not conforming to Islam's other precepts which are just to protect the religion and not to punish bad behaviour
what are you talking about. in a 100% shariah place a people of another religion should be able to do its rituals and practice the religion
thats not the case today. or in some places
because theres no 100% shariah as it used to be back then
@Muhammad Al-Tajir shariah law allows the impregnating of children aged 9
Go on
they just pay jizya and thats it. if a muslim kills theirs the muslim will be executed
Read my comment for perhaps more clarity. It's moreso the abandoning of Truths that may be destabilizing that leads to despotic tendency and a lack of growth, with the benefit of regional stability of culture
@Doctor Anon sources pls
Several examples, like death for apostasy. Also, in Islam, there is virtually no possibility of a guaranteed propagation of religion.
Muslim men have sexual rights to any woman/girl not wearing the Hijab (see Taharrush).
there is no death for apostasy. but there is death for the apostate who goes against the state by attacking it
@Doctor Anon what the hell is taharrush
btw thats egypts ruling
@Muhammad Al-Tajir The line that separates that has been quite shaky.
show me where it says so in the sharia
@Doctor Anon That is not true
@Draco basically practice any religion you want. dont harm others
Woah woah
Hi
Wtf is going on here
and just you know. just dont go attacking the state or you'll be attacked as a result. thats our shariah
its not "kill them wherever you see them" like some dude who obv hasnt read the seerah of the prophet saws
Attacking the state often is sufficed by attacking the religion because there is no separation.
@Draco so apostating is equal to attacking the state?is that what you mean?
Lol. No. Would preaching against Islam be ok in 100% Sharia state?
hmm. good question
probably not. it would get you imprisoned but probably not killed