@Doctor Anon what the hell is taharrush

btw thats egypts ruling

@Muhammad Al-Tajir The line that separates that has been quite shaky.

show me where it says so in the sharia

@Doctor Anon That is not true

@Draco basically practice any religion you want. dont harm others

Woah woah

Hi

Wtf is going on here

and just you know. just dont go attacking the state or you'll be attacked as a result. thats our shariah

its not "kill them wherever you see them" like some dude who obv hasnt read the seerah of the prophet saws

Attacking the state often is sufficed by attacking the religion because there is no separation.

@Draco so apostating is equal to attacking the state?is that what you mean?

Lol. No. Would preaching against Islam be ok in 100% Sharia state?

hmm. good question

probably not. it would get you imprisoned but probably not killed

Well, then that is bad. Because that means that the only way to propagate another religion, which may be anti-degeneracy as well is to take care not to attack established religion, which is a dicey territory.
Which means, the stability of society becomes directly tied to Islam and it is all or nothing package

laws only shariah

if it doesnt exist in qur'an and sunnah we will see among the righteous medieval scholars

which actually do answer most of our daily questions

it goes to fiqh

ijma and qiyas

on a thing that cannot be answered via quran and sunnah

but the prophets companions opinion also count before that

and lastly it only applies to me

because im closer to the maliki school of thought

the practice of the people of medina

and the schools of thought are all right. they dont depart and divide people over the aqeedah

>"muhammed"
>white
oh please

Do they change their names or something?

lmfao no

im brown nigger as fuck

~~Ew~~

but if you say the nigger word you are going to have trouble

Somalia?

yes

niggerblack

nah but ers

srs

iraq

im kurdish