Message from @riacan
Discord ID: 520644543167594528
Or infact socialism
how would you prevent lobbying or the establishment of a state like society?
Austrian economists agree with me
Definition of capitalism. : an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.
Even Chicago
it honestly sounds like you read the definition of capitalism on some american capitalist propoganda on the side of a tin of beans
yes free market
LOL
You prove my point
but it mentions corporate
Corporate is not the state
Definition of capitalism. : an economic system characterized by private or corporate ownership of capital goods, by investments that are determined by private decision, and by prices, production, and the distribution of goods that are determined mainly by competition in a free market.
As Att said
corporations exist as a result of state intervention
The free market
att isn't agreeing with you
Define corporation
that definition is not a good one
thats just one i found
that definition clearly says "determined mainly"
**there are other players**
@riacan Austrians , Chicago and Adam Smith agree with me
called "state"
where do you define a free market?
😂
Define corporation
surely a market is never free while the state exists
Free market is seperstion if state and market
```As used by right-wing apologists for “free market capitalism” (an oxymoron if ever there was one), capitalism is the source of everything good in the world — but also something that never existed. And it switches repeatedly back and forth from one to the other, every couple of sentences, in the same argument. ```
And capitalism is the free market
one can only guess you believe america is socialist then
god help us
No
wow but America is socialist u idiot
It’s not socialist but it’s definitely not capitalist
trump is a fascist and the fascists are socialist
sure adam smith totally agrees with you
which is why he said "The subjects of every state ought to contribute towards the support of the government, as nearly as possible, in proportion to their respective abilities; that is, in proportion to the revenue which they respectively enjoy under the protection of the state"
It’s close to a freer market
how can u separate state and market when the state automatically imposes things like taxation and property onto the market <:GWfroggyBlobThonk:400751075776397322>