Message from @Σ5
Discord ID: 493783712576831509
And of course you would say it's true*
I'm saying that its likely that they are being censored
I'm sure the people who did the tests themselves would actually say you have a misunderstanding
I’m tired. Going back to bed. 💤
much like anything main stream tries to keep quiet
:sweet dreams:
it's traces detected by acid treatment
and by microscope
And as someone that's performed radiometric dating myself many times.. nope, not being censored. No academic scientists are.
main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place
publishers trying to make a story
kev
what would scientists getout of falsifying chronology?
they wanted to keep it quiet
why
but why?
you had one doctor send a specimen to the lab and they dated it, and then this person told them it was a dinosaur bone, and the lab shut that person off from ever sending them anything else again
they are practicing scientism, not real science
excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques
In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)
again _why_ would they do that?
they aren't truthers
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
they don't give a damn about science, or they care too much, either way, people often don't see the reason, or they are too compartmentalized.
I get my pay check and do my family stuff
its work
a hypothesis only becomes a theory when it has been tested and repedatly failed to be falsified
idea doesn't have to be falsified
?
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
yes
idea doesn't have to be falsified
you said falsified
not falsifiable
idea is just an idea
yes
don't speak gibberish