Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 493784175963275285
and by microscope
And as someone that's performed radiometric dating myself many times.. nope, not being censored. No academic scientists are.
main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place
publishers trying to make a story
kev
what would scientists getout of falsifying chronology?
they wanted to keep it quiet
why
but why?
you had one doctor send a specimen to the lab and they dated it, and then this person told them it was a dinosaur bone, and the lab shut that person off from ever sending them anything else again
they are practicing scientism, not real science
I'm.sure they had a real reason
excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques
In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)
again _why_ would they do that?
they aren't truthers
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
they don't give a damn about science, or they care too much, either way, people often don't see the reason, or they are too compartmentalized.
I get my pay check and do my family stuff
its work
a hypothesis only becomes a theory when it has been tested and repedatly failed to be falsified
idea doesn't have to be falsified
?
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
yes
idea doesn't have to be falsified
you said falsified
not falsifiable
idea is just an idea
yes
don't speak gibberish
a bird is just a bird
I don't either
idea can be false or true
Sigma5 speaks much gibberish
Not just can
A hypothesis must be falsifiable
an idea is a concept to do something, whether it can be falsified has no bearing on what practical applications it can have