ok

have you heard about the latest findings with dinosaurs?

?

no what about it?

I've performed a lot of radiometric dating myself, all of which has been accurate.

they found soft tissue in it, doctors found it and send it to the lab

false

this didn't happen in one isolated incident

its happened multiple times

They found remains of the very ruged protienes

they are finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones, still alive

cells still alive

They only found traces of it after they put the fossil into acids to dissolve the rock

now I can definitely say that's false

of course they would say its untrue

you being a talking point saying its not doesn't make it so

And of course you would say it's true*

I'm saying that its likely that they are being censored

I'm sure the people who did the tests themselves would actually say you have a misunderstanding

I’m tired. Going back to bed. 💤

much like anything main stream tries to keep quiet

:sweet dreams:

it's traces detected by acid treatment

and by microscope

And as someone that's performed radiometric dating myself many times.. nope, not being censored. No academic scientists are.

main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place

publishers trying to make a story

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T9rI6uxSC9A

kev

https://isgenesishistory.com/soft-tissue/

what would scientists getout of falsifying chronology?

they wanted to keep it quiet

why

but why?

you had one doctor send a specimen to the lab and they dated it, and then this person told them it was a dinosaur bone, and the lab shut that person off from ever sending them anything else again

they are practicing scientism, not real science

I'm.sure they had a real reason

excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques

In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)

again _why_ would they do that?