Message from @Moist Mayonnaise
Discord ID: 493782660242735105
I've performed a lot of radiometric dating myself, all of which has been accurate.
they found soft tissue in it, doctors found it and send it to the lab
false
this didn't happen in one isolated incident
its happened multiple times
They found remains of the very ruged protienes
they are finding soft tissue in dinosaur bones, still alive
cells still alive
They only found traces of it after they put the fossil into acids to dissolve the rock
now I can definitely say that's false
of course they would say its untrue
you being a talking point saying its not doesn't make it so
And of course you would say it's true*
I'm saying that its likely that they are being censored
I'm sure the people who did the tests themselves would actually say you have a misunderstanding
I’m tired. Going back to bed. 💤
much like anything main stream tries to keep quiet
:sweet dreams:
it's traces detected by acid treatment
and by microscope
And as someone that's performed radiometric dating myself many times.. nope, not being censored. No academic scientists are.
main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place
publishers trying to make a story
kev
what would scientists getout of falsifying chronology?
they wanted to keep it quiet
why
but why?
you had one doctor send a specimen to the lab and they dated it, and then this person told them it was a dinosaur bone, and the lab shut that person off from ever sending them anything else again
they are practicing scientism, not real science
I'm.sure they had a real reason
excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques
In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)
again _why_ would they do that?
they aren't truthers
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
they don't give a damn about science, or they care too much, either way, people often don't see the reason, or they are too compartmentalized.
I get my pay check and do my family stuff