Message from @^Kevin^
Discord ID: 493784227423453184
main stream is actually what gave you that idea in the first place
publishers trying to make a story
kev
what would scientists getout of falsifying chronology?
they wanted to keep it quiet
why
but why?
you had one doctor send a specimen to the lab and they dated it, and then this person told them it was a dinosaur bone, and the lab shut that person off from ever sending them anything else again
they are practicing scientism, not real science
I'm.sure they had a real reason
excessive belief in the power of scientific knowledge and techniques
In that case I see no problem with it(minus the excessive)
again _why_ would they do that?
they aren't truthers
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
they don't give a damn about science, or they care too much, either way, people often don't see the reason, or they are too compartmentalized.
I get my pay check and do my family stuff
a hypothesis only becomes a theory when it has been tested and repedatly failed to be falsified
idea doesn't have to be falsified
?
an idea is only a hypothesis if it's formal, and falsifiable
yes
idea doesn't have to be falsified
you said falsified
not falsifiable
idea is just an idea
yes
don't speak gibberish
a bird is just a bird
I don't either
idea can be false or true
Sigma5 speaks much gibberish
Not just can
A hypothesis must be falsifiable
an idea is a concept to do something, whether it can be falsified has no bearing on what practical applications it can have
I was recently exposed to the probability that most of Einstien's theories were fake
fake math