Message from @Crusader Jenkins
Discord ID: 555105290979246097
Finding reversed 666 in the cloud formations is just silly though. The imporant part is that the clouds were manipulated not which shapes you might abstractly find in them
\
Also that type of thing can be used against flat earthers
can i get that student role
Hello again, I'm back.
I didn't have the chance to do some a research today, sorry about that.
What have you been researching?
ur not
Flat Earth, NASA's lies, etc
Apparently the moon is inside the earth's atmosphere now according to the european space agency.
Really?
shut up
who the fu ck muted me
@Loony Naughty They are burying up curving refraction, the apparent position and geometric position of celestial bodies are not the same
Alright, <@!555104543545753611> has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.
Yet somehow, they can use trigonometry to calculate distances...
That's a huge problem if what they are looking at to help calculate isn't where they think it is.
<:b_:507995503397699585><:a_:507995510624354305><:n_:507995520724369431><:a_:507995510624354305><:n_:507995520724369431><:a_:507995510624354305>
Hm.
@Loony Naughty If you are trying to use trigonometry to calculate distances over a "curved Earth" with "curved light" then assert that a mathematical triangle with three straight lines represents reality, you are only lying to yourself.
Exactly
When they say "we can account for refraction" ask them to cite their refraction model
Mick West uses a "rule of thumb"
NASA presumes a sphere to prove a sphere
Lasers clearly curve up
You know what they say about assumptions...
@Human Sheeple no they assume a sphere to do analysis for tracking something in orbit
Orbit, funny
Jjj
A cartoon of a weather balloon nice
Guess this is a cartoon too
Proof that these are used instead of or ital satellites?
Cartoons, speculation. Where is the proof?