**Revelation 13:17 - Worldwide English (New Testament) (WE)**

```Dust


<17> No one could buy or sell anything if he did not have this mark. This mark is the name of the beast or the number of its name. ```

**Revelation 13:18 - New Revised Standard Version (NRSV)**

```Dust


<18> This calls for wisdom: let anyone with understanding calculate the number of the beast, for it is the number of a person. Its number is six hundred sixty-six. ```

@Deleted User

ywah>

You are now a student

yeah*

Finding reversed 666 in the cloud formations is just silly though. The imporant part is that the clouds were manipulated not which shapes you might abstractly find in them

\

Also that type of thing can be used against flat earthers

can i get that student role

Hello again, I'm back.

I didn't have the chance to do some a research today, sorry about that.

What have you been researching?

ur not

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geostationary_balloon_satellite

Flat Earth, NASA's lies, etc

Apparently the moon is inside the earth's atmosphere now according to the european space agency.

Really?

Alright, @Michael. has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

shut up

who the fu ck muted me

@Loony Naughty They are burying up curving refraction, the apparent position and geometric position of celestial bodies are not the same

Alright, <@!555104543545753611> has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.

Yet somehow, they can use trigonometry to calculate distances...

Is that geodetic refraction simulation really correct?

That's a huge problem if what they are looking at to help calculate isn't where they think it is.

<:b_:507995503397699585><:a_:507995510624354305><:n_:507995520724369431><:a_:507995510624354305><:n_:507995520724369431><:a_:507995510624354305>

Hm.

@Loony Naughty If you are trying to use trigonometry to calculate distances over a "curved Earth" with "curved light" then assert that a mathematical triangle with three straight lines represents reality, you are only lying to yourself.

Exactly

When they say "we can account for refraction" ask them to cite their refraction model

Mick West uses a "rule of thumb"

NASA presumes a sphere to prove a sphere

Lasers clearly curve up

You know what they say about assumptions...

@Human Sheeple no they assume a sphere to do analysis for tracking something in orbit

Orbit, funny

Jjj