Message from @Crusader Jenkins

Discord ID: 555105756706504705


2019-03-12 19:04:18 UTC  

Also that type of thing can be used against flat earthers

2019-03-12 19:04:35 UTC  

can i get that student role

2019-03-12 19:05:37 UTC  

Hello again, I'm back.

2019-03-12 19:05:53 UTC  

I didn't have the chance to do some a research today, sorry about that.

2019-03-12 19:06:09 UTC  

What have you been researching?

2019-03-12 19:06:23 UTC  

ur not

2019-03-12 19:06:35 UTC  

Flat Earth, NASA's lies, etc

2019-03-12 19:07:28 UTC  

Apparently the moon is inside the earth's atmosphere now according to the european space agency.

2019-03-12 19:08:07 UTC  

Really?

2019-03-12 19:08:16 UTC  

Alright, @Michael. has been warned for '**Bad word usage**'.

2019-03-12 19:08:22 UTC  

shut up

2019-03-12 19:08:29 UTC  

who the fu ck muted me

2019-03-12 19:08:40 UTC  

@Loony Naughty They are burying up curving refraction, the apparent position and geometric position of celestial bodies are not the same

2019-03-12 19:08:50 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555104938749984788/FlatEarthRefractionUp6.png

2019-03-12 19:08:56 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555104960384073733/FlatEarthRefractionUp5.png

2019-03-12 19:09:43 UTC  

Alright, <@!555104543545753611> has been warned for '**Duplicated text**'.

2019-03-12 19:09:59 UTC  

Yet somehow, they can use trigonometry to calculate distances...

2019-03-12 19:10:14 UTC  

Is that geodetic refraction simulation really correct?

2019-03-12 19:10:27 UTC  

That's a huge problem if what they are looking at to help calculate isn't where they think it is.

2019-03-12 19:12:05 UTC  

<:b_:507995503397699585><:a_:507995510624354305><:n_:507995520724369431><:a_:507995510624354305><:n_:507995520724369431><:a_:507995510624354305>

2019-03-12 19:12:08 UTC  

Hm.

2019-03-12 19:13:31 UTC  

@Loony Naughty If you are trying to use trigonometry to calculate distances over a "curved Earth" with "curved light" then assert that a mathematical triangle with three straight lines represents reality, you are only lying to yourself.

2019-03-12 19:13:48 UTC  

Exactly

2019-03-12 19:14:16 UTC  

When they say "we can account for refraction" ask them to cite their refraction model

2019-03-12 19:14:28 UTC  

Mick West uses a "rule of thumb"

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555106354944016394/MickWest.png

2019-03-12 19:14:52 UTC  

NASA presumes a sphere to prove a sphere

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555106456194646031/FlatEarthRefractionSmack.png

2019-03-12 19:15:08 UTC  

Lasers clearly curve up

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555106524062547988/DeepinScreenshot_select-area_20190311012411.png

2019-03-12 19:15:18 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555106565443682335/FlatEarthAssume.png

2019-03-12 19:15:21 UTC  

You know what they say about assumptions...

2019-03-12 19:15:26 UTC  

@Human Sheeple no they assume a sphere to do analysis for tracking something in orbit

2019-03-12 19:15:41 UTC  

Orbit, funny

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555106660226433026/BalloonSatellite.jpg

2019-03-12 19:16:16 UTC  

Jjj

2019-03-12 19:16:17 UTC  

A cartoon of a weather balloon nice

2019-03-12 19:16:35 UTC  

Guess this is a cartoon too

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/484514023698726912/555106888455421953/FlatEarthSatelliteBalloon.jpg

2019-03-12 19:16:41 UTC  

Proof that these are used instead of or ital satellites?

2019-03-12 19:17:09 UTC  

Cartoons, speculation. Where is the proof?

2019-03-12 19:17:18 UTC  

Havent they been using those since the 60's or something like that?

2019-03-12 19:17:38 UTC  

Ya orbital satellites have been used since the 60s