@Derek Nelson why would that show axial tilt

it's show earth rotation

@Bazinghis Khan is kickin everyone's ass

THE GRAVITATIONAL FORCE WAS DIRECTLY MEASURED BY CAVENDISH

@carth "DeNsiTy!!"

@Derek Nelson if i swing a bucket of water around quickly, it'll create pressure, but has no lid, why doesn't it fly out the top of hte bucket

@Derek Nelson the earth must be accelerating in a circle

@Derek Nelson earth is accelerating aroudn the sun , making constant acceleration,

which holds the water down and creates the pressure gradient we see

sure there is

i feel acceleration sitting in my seat right now @Derek Nelson

and the observations match a small scale experiment, proven

@Derek Nelson dont you feel the floor pushing you up constantly

@Derek Nelson when you acclerate in a car, does that feel differently than laying on your back?

@TM [Þórljótr] curve can be directly measured with a theodolite

Ya it does it can measure angles precisely, of the horizon drop

@TM [Þórljótr] horizon drop with altitude

Easy

Smart ppl can find it

@TM [Þórljótr] 100% sure

Yep I have masured it

Saying no, makes you wrong

K. You're lying

I can prove it

You cant

https://steemit.com/science/@kerriknox/horizon-drop-the-easiest-most-definitive-way-to-prove-the-curvature-of-the-earth

Gotta use an instrument, not just your eyes

Something that measures

@Deleted User so we do know large distances over earth?

@Human Sheeple no they assume a sphere to do analysis for tracking something in orbit

A cartoon of a weather balloon nice

Proof that these are used instead of or ital satellites?

Cartoons, speculation. Where is the proof?

Ya orbital satellites have been used since the 60s

Where is the proof of all these balloons, video , pictures of them floating above...

Live stream from any of them

Nothing

Nonflerfers has sighted one

This is just concocted speculation

Dunno about all that, but there are still orbital satellites

I work for a company that has put them up there silly, am I a liar?

Biatch please, Sirius XM has satellites

Marco cubesats that went to Mars with insight

@SwmpLvr who thinks that

@SwmpLvr they are, TV radio gps

@SwmpLvr not blanket sat TV in the middle of farmtown

@Loony Naughty you couldn't get the back then unless near a tower

Now you can get it anywhere with a sat dish that points at the sky

@SwmpLvr where is proof it's done with towers, you're speculating

@Loony Naughty yes there is no proof it's coming from a balloon

Balloon says would drift around dummy

@SwmpLvr you have no proof of that, just speculation

@Loony Naughty where does that happen

@Loony Naughty where

The atmosphere thins as it goes up, something flat earth ideas.cant explain

@Loony Naughty yep, it approaches zero, so there's never pressure against vacuum

@SwmpLvr well I launched a satellite and got it's signal exactly where predicted

@Loony Naughty we measure a gradient, it's easy even you can do it

@Loony Naughty ya that's what we observe

Atmosphere gets thinner with altitude

@Loony Naughty outside where, at what altitude

@Loony Naughty if I spin a bucket of water around it makes high pressure, but the water stays in the bucket with no lid, right next to low pressure, how?

@Loony Naughty that makes no sense, it's pressure is higher than the air, so it should flow into the air

@Loony Naughty so the Earth could be spinning around the sun to create this effect

@Loony Naughty have you been to the top of my Everest, or Antarctica?

If not you can't make any claims about those places

@Loony Naughty that's just an unfocused camera image

@Rudi that see pics weren't taken at sea level

@Rudi you guys always do the math wrong

@Rudi that math you show doesn't do observer height at all

@Rudino they didn't wrong

That math only uses the drop of a circle relative to a tanget line

@Human Sheeple why you still here, you've been proven wrong

@Human Sheeple height of mountains is taken into account?

@Human Sheeple atmospheric lensing math? Where is that in your calc

so like towards the ground sometimes

@Human Sheeple why do you believe taht paper, but not those on gravity

cavendish

Paul Heyl

both measured the gravitational force

documented in the same way as your refraction evidence

lol no he didn't

NIST has an uncertainty of 0.15% in gravitational constant

nope

they used uncharged nonmagnetic objects

@Human Sheeple https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/11922814.pdf

proper experiments

that gif is not a cavendish experiment

@realFlatEarther what's your question

23.5 degrees relative to the ecliptic

^ oh wow gif compression,

ok 90-23.5 = 66.5 degrees

24

@Human Sheeple every single one of those is a stretch of imagination to say its fake

or a deliberate misinterpretation, or video compression or low res or somethign else

@Human Sheeple all you have to do is look at this one to know they're really weightless : https://www.space.com/20731-space-washcloth-astronaut-video.html

@realFlatEarther what the hell is the mark of the beast? never heard of it

Kelvon

@Citizen Z blackbody radiation curve