Message from @3v6en8
Discord ID: 626578029820379177
bc it is cool :P
It's neat but also it raises interest (and thus funding) for their genetic research
yeah
yeah its cool, it didnt harm the cats
nor the dogs
I really want them to make a glowing parrot
they could
glow in the dark birds would be cool
like the wings lighting up
glow in the dark animals?
10 years later, after Vietnam War 2:
ah yes
can't wait
Can someone explain to me the argument against Climate Change?
I don't understand how the massive quantities of public evidence and documented history can indicate anything else.
they have payed off scientists by the lobbying groups that are totally legit, and when evidence is presented against you just claim the scientist isnt a "climate scientist"
Another idea is that climate change has already happened
they just get fox news host to get on camera and say "everyone knows climate change is a chinese made conspiracy"
Like we most likely had an ice age and also the earth used to be hot volcanic rocks
So its only brainlets that dont believe in climate change
Because climate change is already happening, its just how much are humans contributing green house gas to the environment
And does it warrant a global crisis or such
Wait a minute. So the youuuur telling me, that the only argument against climate change, is to discredit the scientists?
They also have a fundemental difficulty in understanding scope and scale. Like, the Earth seems BIG, and a human is SMALL. How can human effect Earth?
The earth changes naturally and I get that.
But my problem is that if we fuck up the Ozone, or actually fuck up something that we can't fix and *accelerate* the end of Humanity. Why would we allow that shit?
Because its hard for humans to understand abstract things
Would you rather go extinct thousands of years from now or just a few decades from now. Or potentially within a few lifetimes depending on the evidence and predictions I have not looked.
Also, attacking someone who makes an argument is called ad hominem. You ignore what they say and attack them to discredit them. It is very effective, but it is a logical fallacy. So if the only wide arguments against human contribution to climate change is towards the scientists that do it... I'm sorry but that is just incredibly sad.
Welp, contemporary news like to portray politics like a reality show
Which fkn sucks lmfao. Why do we make that shit a joke.
That is what the Kardashians are for.
and we have companies that pollute for money and make laws that protect them and they are the ones that pay the politicians bills
if alex jones was right about 1 thing its there was a company that dumped chemicals in a swamp, and it made the frogs gay
So your solution is 0 carbon emissions?
That will never be possible lol