Message from @sɪᴅɪsɴᴏᴛʜᴇʀᴇ

Discord ID: 679685513937944628


2020-02-19 13:45:07 UTC  

Not really, combined with the people who *didn't* vote.

2020-02-19 13:45:10 UTC  

That's a good sign.

2020-02-19 13:45:10 UTC  

2012 also conformed to the generic ballot

2020-02-19 13:45:45 UTC  

That means a full 1/3rd of people who voted for trump in 2016 but voted for a dem in 2018 are definitely voting against him in 2020

2020-02-19 13:45:50 UTC  

Not exactly

2020-02-19 13:45:53 UTC  

That is not a good sign for trump- it’s a sign of...

2020-02-19 13:45:55 UTC  

Many of those haven't made their mind up.

2020-02-19 13:45:57 UTC  

HIS BASE SHRINKING

2020-02-19 13:46:02 UTC  

No, literally that’s what that means

2020-02-19 13:46:10 UTC  

If his base is shrinking, party affiliations would be going the inverse way.

2020-02-19 13:46:16 UTC  

That’s not accurate.

2020-02-19 13:46:18 UTC  

His approval would be falling.

2020-02-19 13:46:27 UTC  

Again, no evidence to support that

2020-02-19 13:46:32 UTC  

A rising approval means there's something wrong with your hypothesis.

2020-02-19 13:46:41 UTC  

No, it really doesn’t

2020-02-19 13:46:53 UTC  

It just means you don’t understand what approval rating is measuring

2020-02-19 13:46:56 UTC  

Well it clearly does, more people approve. And damn approval ratings are good predictors of wins

2020-02-19 13:47:02 UTC  

Approval of Trump, simply put.

2020-02-19 13:47:09 UTC  

Lmao

2020-02-19 13:47:25 UTC  

a. Approval ratings are not indicative of wins right now

2020-02-19 13:47:34 UTC  

They've been for ages?

2020-02-19 13:47:37 UTC  

b. His approval rating is super low

2020-02-19 13:47:41 UTC  

Not till about March

2020-02-19 13:47:43 UTC  

>49%

2020-02-19 13:47:45 UTC  

>Super low

2020-02-19 13:47:50 UTC  

...yes

2020-02-19 13:47:56 UTC  

I'm pretty sure all he needs is 45% to win.

2020-02-19 13:48:02 UTC  

44% is a more accurate number

2020-02-19 13:48:03 UTC  

on 538 that's 46% lol

2020-02-19 13:48:09 UTC  

How is "44%" an accurate number?

2020-02-19 13:48:15 UTC  

Aaaand no president has won with under 50%

2020-02-19 13:48:22 UTC  

Yes, we'll see that go above soon.

2020-02-19 13:48:34 UTC  

It's trending upwards, I mean have you seen 538 recently?

2020-02-19 13:48:37 UTC  

<#542037236053442561>

2020-02-19 13:48:50 UTC  

538 has him at 44

2020-02-19 13:49:02 UTC  

46%*

2020-02-19 13:49:07 UTC  

You're not using registered or likely voters.

2020-02-19 13:49:16 UTC  

and an dis-approval of 50%

2020-02-19 13:49:33 UTC  

You’re mixing metrics dude

2020-02-19 13:49:36 UTC  

Jesus Christ

2020-02-19 13:49:45 UTC  

Not really, I like using this since it's closer to the true value.