Message from @Ishkode
Discord ID: 571155762584354856
Morals do have importance.
Morals are subjective
and useless
Well for me it comes down to personal experience,
they are never neutral
And the fact that my religion holds important information that modern science is recently catching up on.
@Techpriest What are your philosophical axioms based on?
Another atheist republican
I cannot however,
Speak for other religions.
join the club
based on thomas hobbes
He believes that nature cannot make errors, and our definition of good and evil are only based on former authors before us.
If nature cause 10k people to die in a fire, is she evil?
Only when man say she is evil.
But a fire naturally happens and bring new growth.
Nature cannot make errors because nature does not have intent.
Therefore the most neutral decision is to throw away your morals
and become Machiavelli
doubt
what is manslaughter
It's not an error in logic.
It is an error because humans said so
It's bad,
Not errorous.
Bad as in the subjective thing based on your morals.
an error is a mistake
Oh gods. I hate that bot.
Nature cannot make mistakes,
but manslaughter can be a mistake
that
That's why manslaughter charges exist in the first place
is very debatable
An error, at least in the terminology I am using,
Is to be incorrect.
would you rather be charged with murder or manslaughter if you accidentally kill someone
If I say rocks are made of cloth,
Manslaughter is simply a murder in mistake