they are never neutral

And the fact that my religion holds important information that modern science is recently catching up on.

@Techpriest What are your philosophical axioms based on?

Another atheist republican

I cannot however,

Speak for other religions.

join the club

based on thomas hobbes

He believes that nature cannot make errors, and our definition of good and evil are only based on former authors before us.

If nature cause 10k people to die in a fire, is she evil?

Only when man say she is evil.

But a fire naturally happens and bring new growth.

Nature cannot make errors because nature does not have intent.

Therefore the most neutral decision is to throw away your morals

and become Machiavelli

You cannot be errorous if you do not have intent or goals.

doubt

what is manslaughter

It's not an error in logic.

It is an error because humans said so

It's bad,

Not errorous.

Bad as in the subjective thing based on your morals.

GG @Ishkode, you just advanced to level 1!

an error is a mistake

Oh gods. I hate that bot.

Nature cannot make mistakes,

but manslaughter can be a mistake

that

That's why manslaughter charges exist in the first place

is very debatable

An error, at least in the terminology I am using,

Is to be incorrect.

would you rather be charged with murder or manslaughter if you accidentally kill someone

If I say rocks are made of cloth,

Manslaughter is simply a murder in mistake

That is an error.

Also, manslaughter can be a mistake,

Because humans can make mistakes.

Our intention via our laws and societies is to NOT kill.

Hence manslaughter.