I do act as an atheist instead of as a religious person,

When it comes to anything professional or important decisions.

Since that IS the most neutral position if you want to make an honest decision.

hmmm

naw

The most neutral position in making an honest decision

is to throw away morals

and become based

Only humans can say what is good and evil.

Nature cannot err.

Eh. I prefer not to do that.

Please explain me how you can logically justify religion @Ishkode

Morals do have importance.

Morals are subjective

and useless

Well for me it comes down to personal experience,

they are never neutral

And the fact that my religion holds important information that modern science is recently catching up on.

@Techpriest What are your philosophical axioms based on?

Another atheist republican

I cannot however,

Speak for other religions.

join the club

based on thomas hobbes

He believes that nature cannot make errors, and our definition of good and evil are only based on former authors before us.

If nature cause 10k people to die in a fire, is she evil?

Only when man say she is evil.

But a fire naturally happens and bring new growth.

Nature cannot make errors because nature does not have intent.

Therefore the most neutral decision is to throw away your morals

and become Machiavelli

You cannot be errorous if you do not have intent or goals.

doubt

what is manslaughter

It's not an error in logic.

It is an error because humans said so

It's bad,

Not errorous.

Bad as in the subjective thing based on your morals.

GG @Ishkode, you just advanced to level 1!

an error is a mistake