Message from @lemonsaw
Discord ID: 573315941115494402
and so does race
Yews
Im just claiming
but it serves very little utility scientifically speaking, if not any.
Sure
I can accept that
You can define race as broadly or as small as you want
GG @Yiddlemethisgoyim, you just advanced to level 3!
The problem is that the statistics about black people having lower IQs don't account for any sort of genetic, environmental, or additional factors. There is zero context.
It doesn't necissarily prove anything.
But then once again you know I'll come back to my earlier argument
you use race when you need it
but deny it when you don't like the facts
Yes, when it serves utility.
I said scientifically speaking it doesn't serve any.
Who are you talking to lemon.
"Black people" are incredibly different
You give an advantage to black people in America because statistically they are not treating fairly
Exactly
Has a lower IQ in general
Now we can't use race
It's too "broad"
Why?
Cause thats not how science works
Then you can't use affirmative action
Do you agree
No, we can use race. Its just that that statistic is incorrect. In fact most statistics are unreliable points of information used to push an agenda.
Affirmative action isn't science you melonhead.
So
Do you agree with affirmative action?
Yes.
and if those two following premises were true:
IQ is based 100% on genetics
There is a IQ difference between race
No, it's absolutely not.
Im saying if it were true
That's not how fucking science works
or epistemology.
Let's say you accept the premises