Message from @lemonsaw
Discord ID: 573316432255778828
I said scientifically speaking it doesn't serve any.
Who are you talking to lemon.
"Black people" are incredibly different
You give an advantage to black people in America because statistically they are not treating fairly
Exactly
But we find that this same group of people
Has a lower IQ in general
Now we can't use race
It's too "broad"
Why?
Cause thats not how science works
Then you can't use affirmative action
Do you agree
No, we can use race. Its just that that statistic is incorrect. In fact most statistics are unreliable points of information used to push an agenda.
Affirmative action isn't science you melonhead.
So
Do you agree with affirmative action?
Yes.
and if those two following premises were true:
IQ is based 100% on genetics
No, it's absolutely not.
Im saying if it were true
That's not how fucking science works
or epistemology.
Let's say you accept the premises
I dont
Im just trying to isolate the part where we disagree
that's why im making an hypothetical
OK
Let's just say they were true
Why would we speak in hypotheticals...
Would you still agree with Affirmative action
Yes
Why
Assuming the premises are true
Because it'd aid in providing extra knowledge to those who otherwise would be a burden on the system
and would allow them to function in society.
But you are stopping people with more potential achieve better
Make more classrooms