Yiddlemethisgoyim

Discord ID: 525953810368299013


151 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2 | Next

2019-04-30 07:54:22 UTC [NEWS and POLITICS #trump]  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/513098339961798676/572692209372102667/blue-vs-red-image-fed.-dep.jpg

Race literally serves no purpose as a scientific category.

IQ's of racist people are lower on average

Therefore, if you're low racist, you have a lower IQ on average.

Libertarians have the highest IQ's

Therefore, if you're not a Libertarian, you must be stupid!

Literally this is your logic.

That doesn't mean that race is a legitimate category scientifically speaking nor useful

Notice how I haven't uttered the words racist

Yet you're chimping out and not addressing my points?

Its almost as if you're a fucking moron

OK, conservatives in America how lower IQ's on average

Whats your point?

Libertarians have the highest IQ's

Are you a Libertarian?

Notice how you're not addressing what I said.

Therefore, on average you will have a lower IQ

This category you've created serves equal purpose to that of race

or political group of people

Low IQ retard literally isn't addressing whats being said

Typical.

OK, moron, the argument is that race isn't a scientific category.

Not that certain groups of people don't have lower IQ's

LOOK PEOPLE IN BLUE NEW YORK HAVE HIGHER IQS WHEN COMPARED TO PEOPLE IN LOUISIANA, THEREFORE, NEW YORK IS THE BETTER GROUP OF PEOPLE!

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/513098515736690701/572985809024843786/maxresdefault.jpg

Literally your own argument right now.

This doesn't mean race is a scientific category.

Please, demonstrate that race is a legitimate scientific category.

Go ahead big brain.

>inb4 he posts another graph

OK, how does this prove that race is a scientific category.

"Even though there is a broad scientific agreement that essentialist and typological conceptualizations of race are untenable"

your literal own source disagrees with you, you fucking mongoloid

Prove it.

Are you this dumb?

Unironically?

You can't make a scientific category based on the colour they are you fucking idiot

There's "black" people in asia.

These are blacks right?

Just wondering

Wrong moron

They're people from papau new guinea

they have no relation to african people

You're unironically low IQ

Just because someone is a of different colour, doesn't mean that you can create a sub category of human beings

By this same logic, people from papau new guinea would be placed in the same genetic category as people from from africa.

Yet they literally aren't related at all

This demonstrates that your category of "black" is retarded

I have to be frank here, you must either be underaged or retarded.

Pick one.

Whichever bests suits you

Race is a bullshit category

If you want to look at IQ and genes, look at ancestry.

@lemonsaw and certain political groups of people have higher IQ's

Libertarians have the highest IQ's

Whats the relevance of race?

You can't attribute it to melanin even if its true.

Or whatever phenotypic traits you want.

Because black people were disadvantaged in America on the basis of their race.

Doesn't mean that it's a legitimate scientific category.

It can be

No you can have it be both enviromental

and genetic.

the environment also influences IQ.

Please provide me a study that says its 60-80% genetic.

Sure but its perfectly possible to have environment influence ones genetics

which would then in turn influence ones IQ

Yes

Not anthropologists

not biologists.

doesn't make it useful nor scientifically true

Because its a political class of people who are and were oppressed

its not practical to look at their ancestry

on an individual basis.

What we know is that generally, black people were and are treated unfairly in America.

Especially with regards to education

Schools in black area's will just be worst by virtue of having less funding

Libertarians also have higher IQ's

than any other political group

Yes you can, I deny race as a scientific category

while also admitting it does exsist as a political group

and a descriptive group

Like red heads

or blondes

or people with blue eyes

they serve utility with regards to the description of people

and so does race

but it serves very little utility scientifically speaking, if not any.

You can define race as broadly or as small as you want

Yes, when it serves utility.

I said scientifically speaking it doesn't serve any.

"Black people" are incredibly different

Exactly

Cause thats not how science works

Affirmative action isn't science you melonhead.

Yes.

No, it's absolutely not.

That's not how fucking science works

or epistemology.

151 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Page 1/2 | Next