It's too "broad"

Why?

Cause thats not how science works

Then you can't use affirmative action

Do you agree

No, we can use race. Its just that that statistic is incorrect. In fact most statistics are unreliable points of information used to push an agenda.

Affirmative action isn't science you melonhead.

So

Do you agree with affirmative action?

Yes.

and if those two following premises were true:

IQ is based 100% on genetics

There is a IQ difference between race

No, it's absolutely not.

Im saying if it were true

That's not how fucking science works

or epistemology.

Let's say you accept the premises

I dont

https://ed.ted.com/lessons/how-statistics-can-be-misleading-mark-liddell
Watch this.

Im just trying to isolate the part where we disagree

that's why im making an hypothetical

OK

Let's just say they were true

Why would we speak in hypotheticals...

Would you still agree with Affirmative action

Yes

Why

Assuming the premises are true

Because it'd aid in providing extra knowledge to those who otherwise would be a burden on the system

and would allow them to function in society.

But you are stopping people with more potential achieve better

Make more classrooms

or more universities.

Then you're not advocating for affirmative action

I am, I'm advocating for the advantaging of certain groups of people on a political basis.

Because they have a disadvantage in society

Right?

I'm saying black people will have to go through things irrespective of their IQ's, in which, would make it harder for them to make it through school

and as such, I'd use the admissions process as a means of equalization due to this.

They're not really