@Mr1Gonzalez seems a bit drastic?

You should’ve been here earlier

what did he do exactly?

@Deleted User https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Origins_of_Hutu,_Tutsi_and_Twa

tyty chuck

So i made a claim, he asked me to back it up. So I did, then he started spamming and I asked him to stop and then he started attacking me and then making photoshopped pics

https://is.mendelu.cz/eknihovna/opory/zobraz_cast.pl?cast=69574 @Deleted User

What are these violent conflicts about? The simplest answer is political power in a disputed territory. Most of the conflicts involve a regional minority who want to separate and form their own state, or at least their own autonomous region. The conflicts in Burma (Karens), India (Kashmir), the Palestinian territories (occupied by Israel), Philippines (Muslims), Russia (Chechnya), Sri Lanka (Tamils) and Turkey (Kurds) are more or less of this type. In other cases, the insurgent ethnic group wants to take over government of the whole country: thus Burundi’s majority Hutus wish to take power from the minority Tutsi government.

ay tytytyty

GG @Deleted User, you just advanced to level 2!

@Mr1Gonzalez photoshopped pics? <:wut:362331820437798933>

Yea

wtf

uh

hmm

-warn @Dr.Cosby falsifying chat logs

⚠ Warned `Dr.Gobus#1987`

Thanks I’m satisfied now and moving on

kurdistan yeee

i was gonna kick him as well

lol

Sorry for losing my cool

i didnt notice the photoshopped chat log ye thats p gay

That’s one of the reasons he irked me so much lol

!mute @Dr.Cosby s 2h dont falsify stuff on here

I was over here telling my story about how I survived on $8 an hour and he just idek

Any worker whose value-added is viewed by the employer to be greater than the competitive market wage that has to be paid for his hire is offered work by the employer in question. When the government imposes a legal minimum hourly wage above the wage currently prevailing for various types of labor services, the law necessarily threatens the employment of any and all workers who’s estimated value-added is now less than the mandated legal minimum wage.

Suppose that a worker helps to produce an addition to marketable output that has a competitive value of, say, $5 an hour. But the government now imposes a minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. Those workers whose value-added is only $5 an hour will find themselves priced out of the market, because from the employer’s perspective, they cost more to employ than they are worth in terms of value-adding revenue to be earned from their hire at a minimum wage of $7.25. A private enterpriser cannot successfully maintain or establish a profitable competitive edge in the long run, if (at the margin) he has to pay $7.25 for what has a market worth of $5.

thats basically the rationale for the no min wage people @Dr.Cosby

the idea is that a company will provide more jobs and have greater net employee wages without

i see both sides and im not sure what the solution is id have to read more about it but thats the counter argument anyway

The only “bad” thing about it is that companies get more control and they could become more monopolized at a faster rate

Providing more jobs doesn't necessarily mean providing good-paying jobs. What's the point of being paid $5 an hour when that can barely get you anything. If anything, that just means the government has to tax businesses and the rich higher to maintain welfare (assuming welfare remains constant in this scenario)

Because cost of living goes down too

Apartments will charge less

Groceries will cost less

That isn't necessarily always true. Look at HK for example.

HK? Show me a link

Lemme pull up some stats

Okay