Dogpilling is not the way to go here.

Though ill say, I can respect his persistance and bluntness.

see the difference between black people in the usa and muslems in europe is the difference between why one isint a problem and why one is a problem. in america black people are asking for ghettos to be fixed, in europe muslims are asking for everything to become a ghetto

Look lads I don't think this is going anywhere so good night or what ever time it is over there.

But you need to go beyond relying on snippets of info from questionqble sources

I dunno... this is pretty beautiful. We're getting a rather strong point across here.

Nah, ill leave it to him to decide

All of us are free thinkers, yet we all come to the same conclusions, from different angles.

Well we all agree with what aussie is sYing. Well the problem to be specific.

Qe dont like the solution

to adress an american problem the first step is to actually understand america

there is no solution given

Well, in general, I'd say we're opposed to demographical justice as opposed to individual justice.

Correct me if I'm wrong, there.

i mean, eugenics & mass deportation was a solution, just not one I like

and not assume an american problem is a racial one inherint to all humans cuz thats jsut silly

There is, a questionable one.

eugenics is just a slippery slope for gulag level thinking, because where do you draw the line, and why, etc

Any time you eliminate the bottom 10%

you create a new bottom 10%

that, and you shrink the pool

well aussie did draw the line, my main arguement agianst eugenics is just at its core it doesent solve anything

Well.. and the amount of govt contol needed to carry it out

and theres the reason it wont work

I am looking at it from the libertarian angle.

either eugenics is used to lighthanded that it doesent actually have an effect, or else its used to strongly and you start getting population problems

I see the crime as a consequence to live with

because the very same government you give control to,

Will turn on you once the pendulum swings, and suddenly its "Dear white people, you need to be eugenic-sized"

i think population growth is more important to control than eugenics

And regardless, you're giving government even more control over a population.

Well it is now. And I reckon its that messaging that resulted in people like aussie coming about

china isint a great place to live

kill half the population and it becomes much nicer

mao knew what was up

i hear nuclear winter?

we'll tackle global warming that way too

but i actually prefer the "just dont have so many fucking kids" method of population control

Paris-Accord tipped recreational nukes.

Well, you need alot of govt controll there as well.

nah, getting less kids is a phenomenon linked to wealth,

I am not anarchist. But when the govt decides what we say or do tahts not harming anyone thats where im drawing the line.