Message from @Arch-Fiend

Discord ID: 446230964839120916


2018-05-16 08:38:25 UTC  

There is, a questionable one.

2018-05-16 08:38:56 UTC  

eugenics is just a slippery slope for gulag level thinking, because where do you draw the line, and why, etc

2018-05-16 08:39:10 UTC  

Any time you eliminate the bottom 10%

2018-05-16 08:39:15 UTC  

you create a new bottom 10%

2018-05-16 08:39:21 UTC  

that, and you shrink the pool

2018-05-16 08:39:37 UTC  

well aussie did draw the line, my main arguement agianst eugenics is just at its core it doesent solve anything

2018-05-16 08:39:48 UTC  

Well.. and the amount of govt contol needed to carry it out

2018-05-16 08:40:03 UTC  

and theres the reason it wont work

2018-05-16 08:40:10 UTC  

I am looking at it from the libertarian angle.

2018-05-16 08:40:20 UTC  

either eugenics is used to lighthanded that it doesent actually have an effect, or else its used to strongly and you start getting population problems

2018-05-16 08:40:22 UTC  

I see the crime as a consequence to live with

2018-05-16 08:40:42 UTC  

because the very same government you give control to,

Will turn on you once the pendulum swings, and suddenly its "Dear white people, you need to be eugenic-sized"

2018-05-16 08:40:54 UTC  

i think population growth is more important to control than eugenics

2018-05-16 08:40:54 UTC  

And regardless, you're giving government even more control over a population.

2018-05-16 08:41:15 UTC  

Well it is now. And I reckon its that messaging that resulted in people like aussie coming about

2018-05-16 08:41:28 UTC  

china isint a great place to live

2018-05-16 08:41:45 UTC  

kill half the population and it becomes much nicer

2018-05-16 08:41:56 UTC  

mao knew what was up

2018-05-16 08:41:57 UTC  

i hear nuclear winter?

2018-05-16 08:42:06 UTC  

we'll tackle global warming that way too

2018-05-16 08:42:32 UTC  

but i actually prefer the "just dont have so many fucking kids" method of population control

2018-05-16 08:42:33 UTC  

Paris-Accord tipped recreational nukes.

2018-05-16 08:42:51 UTC  

Well, you need alot of govt controll there as well.

2018-05-16 08:43:29 UTC  

nah, getting less kids is a phenomenon linked to wealth,

2018-05-16 08:43:34 UTC  

I am not anarchist. But when the govt decides what we say or do tahts not harming anyone thats where im drawing the line.

2018-05-16 08:43:36 UTC  

it works itself out once you get enough moolah

2018-05-16 08:43:59 UTC  

Remove or lessen welfare, make it dependent on charity.

2018-05-16 08:44:07 UTC  

eh atleast in western countrys we have adopted economic systems that deincentivize the nuclear family to the extent that we wont ever really have a population problem

2018-05-16 08:44:12 UTC  

There, have all the abortions you want.

2018-05-16 08:44:22 UTC  

that

2018-05-16 08:44:45 UTC  

the issue we have right now is that the rich are paying for people to pop out babies now

2018-05-16 08:44:50 UTC  

I work for my shit. I pay for it cause I use it.

2018-05-16 08:45:05 UTC  

Abort or give birth

2018-05-16 08:45:07 UTC  

pop out babys?

2018-05-16 08:45:10 UTC  

Pop can mean both

2018-05-16 08:45:19 UTC  

Actually is more for birth

2018-05-16 08:45:20 UTC  

like rich paying for serigates?

2018-05-16 08:45:21 UTC  

i said popping, not cappin'

2018-05-16 08:45:28 UTC  

no, as in

2018-05-16 08:45:38 UTC  

single mothers etc get subsidiaries etc for each baby

2018-05-16 08:45:44 UTC  

so a parent with many kids will get more money