What were the british before they became a monarchy?

https://youtu.be/RmHY04YtfQE

What? A genetic mutation?

<:GWtogaPagChomp:384871972229742592>

Yes the peoples descendants of the Brittish people are very simaler because they have simaler or bassicly the same genes.

Or was it the act of one man trying to gather as much power as possible. Realized it worked, and his decendants realizing it worked

And continuing it?

Blacks didnt benefit from white expansion in their eyes. Since they saw whites who had perfected it benefit more.

My point is whites build and maintain western civilization because they have the genes to.

Then you better explain how it came about from genes.

Cause that wouldnt explain egyptians, mongols, or chinese.

Or the romans

Genes take very long for any dicernable difference to appear

YOu cant expect one generation of allowing in germanians to ruin it

Due to genes instead of you know, Ceasar's assassination, and well, the barbarianization of the nation.

How does genes override several millenia of teachings and superstition?

A example I gave was the of occupation of vietnam by the Chinese for 1000 years but still the vietnamese recreated their cutlure because it's mostly about genes.

And how about the janissaries that were kidnapped by the muslims from christian families?

They sure as hell didnt stay christian

You can keep brainwashing other peoples to become western but once you can't keep doing that they will just go back to the way they normanly are. Non-whites aren't naturally western you have to keep forcing them to be.

And how about the auxillaries that became roman citizens?

By serving in the military.

Exactly, people will always deal with people most similar to themselves. By serving in the millitary, they made their connection to the millitary stronger than that to the people.

Again you can force different peoples to be like you but once you stop forcing them to be like you they will just go back to being the way they are.

Anything else more complex than that like style of governance, relligious belief, or even patterns of artistic merit? How much can you attribute that to genetics and how much to ancestral knowledge?

And people know that times of hardship or even "siege mentality" is very effective at making people even more closed minded.

Give me a exmple of what yo want working even after people are left to themsleves. I can give you many examples to prove what I am saying but you can't.

Christianity wasn't western at frist but over time it decame more westernized because the followers of that faith were. You see biology is more important then ideology in the long term.

Oh im sorry, its not like I spend every day arguing with strangers about why my genes are superior.

I don't say me genes are superior.

I am sorry, but you sound very confident about what you are saying, but I need to know your thought process that led you to saying why something complex like style of governence is passed down by only genetics

Retention of ideas? Yeah I will believe that.

Grasping new ideas? Sure

Or creating and innovating on existing ones. Sure

aussieAryan's going to revert back to being a criminal worth sending to a penal colony if we don't pressure him, it's in his genetic nature I'm sure

Race is a good metric to measure a nation's exposure.

A nation with alot of races = a nation that is very accepting of other races.

A nation with more homogenity is one that is more traditional.

But not every nation exists in a vaccum.

And people will always fall back to the teachings of their ancestors.

Or what they recall from their own collective identity.