Message from @Ghostler
Discord ID: 466015109521735710
Also. Aren't we at a point where global warming is irreversible?
#6 π€
suprised dentist isn't even on top 10
Dentist are sadist
The list doesn't surprise me
Maybe the journo want to see the world burn
lol, George Bush's Crawford Ranch is actually a green home, while Al Gore's house spends 2,400 a month on energy bills.
20 times the national average in natural gas alone...
o_o
How big is his house for him to use that much
Well the one being described there is his home in Nashville.
well, take into consideration
Bush saves a lot, cuz he has an Outhouse instead of a toilet π
@RyeNorth to see hypocritical, just look at silicon valley. "we need to save the environment.... now please excuse me while i waste the most energy out of everyone, requiring more fossil fuels to be burned, then go buy 10 times more things than i needed, and keep getting the latest and greatest even if my old stuff still works. I like my green carbon footprint.... that is 30 times bigger than your average dirty industry"
how about hollywood stars with 100m bank accounts asking normal people to donate to a good cause
I'll take JJ Watt over that shit any day of the week.
He may not be from around here, but the man's a damned Texan in more than team name.
There are more white supremacists (and general racists) on the left, prove me wrong. (usually back handed comments, like with Kelly Osbourne and her house cleaners comments)
Whites need to defeat the hordes to survive
The IQ limit on pigs is mostly because the more intelligent are apparently likely to hop according to some departments
Nice little factoid; not much else.
I think the west should re-colonise the world in a new generation of conquest
change my mind!
In current era of decentralised resistance style warfare you could only achieve this by carriing out proper genicide.
There is a reason why US cant stamp the resisters in iraq and Afghanistan.
Its two completely different style of warfare clashing against each other
what was the west famous for after colonising africa? π
ship the locals to the cotton fields! π
Serious question, how is the debate on immigration still a thing
I get the people that are already here and pathway to freedom, etc, not a fan but, just can't really do anything else
but how is Trump's comment: βWell, I have a solution: Tell people not to come to our country illegally. That's the solution: Don't come to our country illegally. Come like other people doβcome legally. I'm saying this very simply: We have laws, we have borders. Don't come to our country illegally.β
contenscious?
the issue is a matter of (education * location ^ 2),
The easiest people to immigrate to a nation like America are either: The Rich, or The Educated
This would create a very general area of income, namely, the western world, where people in general are rich and educated.
In the other parts of the world, Those who are educated get decent jobs and get a decent living, as such they have no need to go anywhere, and the average person is POOR by comaprison to say America.
America doesn't need 1000's of non-skilled poor workers, cuz it has too much already compared to the job market
So this leads to an obvious place of where immigrants flow from Easily vs where they dont.
And you can then reflect this off of race too, since the westernworld is primarily white. and the non-western rich nations are places like Asia (japan etc)
The obvious "accepted" people would be white or oriental. The rejected people would be people from middle america/southern america/africa/middle east.
Because there the average person is poor and uneducated.
So whilst on a fair basis, it is the fix.
It will clearly be less favorable with latinos, arabs and black people cuz they can immigrate less
Hence its not a matter of following procedure, its a matter of "This causes racial imbalance, hence ITS RACIST"
I'm quite alright with legal immigration
but you can only culturally integrate so many people at once
I also don't understand how anyone can think borders are racist
I'm going to make the racist assumption that many immigrants are probably poor as they are leaving poor countries, thus putting strain on the social programs
which would be ok if we're talking legal immigration, but when you open the flood gates, these social programs are probably getting overloaded
i just explained that,
With borders, YOU decide who comes in, and obviously you want someone taht contributes more than they cost, instead of someone that costs more than they contribute.
So you want "THE BEST", and the best comes from other developped nations, which are primarily white or asian π