Message from @Dr.Wol

Discord ID: 466265888023248926


2018-07-09 22:57:40 UTC  

it's a cute focus but it's not something super encompassing as far as I can tell.

2018-07-09 22:57:52 UTC  

Nice little factoid; not much else.

2018-07-10 11:11:53 UTC  

I think the west should re-colonise the world in a new generation of conquest

2018-07-10 11:12:00 UTC  

change my mind!

2018-07-10 11:17:59 UTC  

In current era of decentralised resistance style warfare you could only achieve this by carriing out proper genicide.

2018-07-10 11:18:40 UTC  

There is a reason why US cant stamp the resisters in iraq and Afghanistan.

2018-07-10 11:19:17 UTC  

Its two completely different style of warfare clashing against each other

2018-07-10 11:22:18 UTC  

what was the west famous for after colonising africa? πŸ˜‰

2018-07-10 11:22:53 UTC  

ship the locals to the cotton fields! πŸ˜„

2018-07-10 15:16:21 UTC  

Serious question, how is the debate on immigration still a thing

2018-07-10 15:16:54 UTC  

I get the people that are already here and pathway to freedom, etc, not a fan but, just can't really do anything else

2018-07-10 15:17:07 UTC  

but how is Trump's comment: β€œWell, I have a solution: Tell people not to come to our country illegally. That's the solution: Don't come to our country illegally. Come like other people doβ€”come legally. I'm saying this very simply: We have laws, we have borders. Don't come to our country illegally.”

2018-07-10 15:17:17 UTC  

contenscious?

2018-07-10 15:27:44 UTC  

the issue is a matter of (education * location ^ 2),

The easiest people to immigrate to a nation like America are either: The Rich, or The Educated
This would create a very general area of income, namely, the western world, where people in general are rich and educated.

In the other parts of the world, Those who are educated get decent jobs and get a decent living, as such they have no need to go anywhere, and the average person is POOR by comaprison to say America.

America doesn't need 1000's of non-skilled poor workers, cuz it has too much already compared to the job market

So this leads to an obvious place of where immigrants flow from Easily vs where they dont.
And you can then reflect this off of race too, since the westernworld is primarily white. and the non-western rich nations are places like Asia (japan etc)
The obvious "accepted" people would be white or oriental. The rejected people would be people from middle america/southern america/africa/middle east.

Because there the average person is poor and uneducated.

2018-07-10 15:28:44 UTC  

So whilst on a fair basis, it is the fix.

It will clearly be less favorable with latinos, arabs and black people cuz they can immigrate less

Hence its not a matter of following procedure, its a matter of "This causes racial imbalance, hence ITS RACIST"

2018-07-10 15:31:12 UTC  

I'm quite alright with legal immigration

2018-07-10 15:31:32 UTC  

but you can only culturally integrate so many people at once

2018-07-10 15:32:52 UTC  

I also don't understand how anyone can think borders are racist

2018-07-10 15:33:34 UTC  

I'm going to make the racist assumption that many immigrants are probably poor as they are leaving poor countries, thus putting strain on the social programs

2018-07-10 15:34:07 UTC  

which would be ok if we're talking legal immigration, but when you open the flood gates, these social programs are probably getting overloaded

2018-07-10 15:34:10 UTC  

i just explained that,

With borders, YOU decide who comes in, and obviously you want someone taht contributes more than they cost, instead of someone that costs more than they contribute.

So you want "THE BEST", and the best comes from other developped nations, which are primarily white or asian πŸ˜‰

2018-07-10 15:34:29 UTC  

that's not even what I want either πŸ˜ƒ

2018-07-10 15:34:45 UTC  

no but thats why its an "issue"

2018-07-10 15:34:46 UTC  

I'm quite alright with people coming from the poor countries, legally

2018-07-10 15:34:58 UTC  

immigrants are going to be awesome citizens

2018-07-10 15:35:05 UTC  

and patriotic and all of that

2018-07-10 15:35:11 UTC  

I don't care if they're poor or not

2018-07-10 15:35:12 UTC  

Immigration for the sake of diversity is stupid. Immigration should be used to take people who will make the country better.

2018-07-10 15:35:16 UTC  

(in most cases)

2018-07-10 15:35:34 UTC  

you can be poor and make the country better

2018-07-10 15:35:49 UTC  

so that's not even an argument, or should be

2018-07-10 15:35:54 UTC  

but yeah merit based is good too

2018-07-10 15:36:08 UTC  

yes, but having a rich person (to pay taxes) or an educated person (to work difficult high-prosperity jobs) is a "Safer bet" than a "maybe he'll do well"

2018-07-10 15:36:21 UTC  

true

2018-07-10 15:36:44 UTC  

Of course you could be poor and make the country better. That's the great thing about merit. It ignores social status and race.

2018-07-10 15:36:50 UTC  

but that's basically calling for an ethnostate πŸ˜ƒ (substitute wealth for race)

2018-07-10 15:36:58 UTC  

i mean, would you rather have a licensed pilot fly your airplane? or a mexican who is nice and calls you his hombre? πŸ˜›

2018-07-10 15:37:15 UTC  

and has a plumbers license

2018-07-10 15:37:27 UTC  

just to reference that talk show woman πŸ˜„

2018-07-10 15:37:28 UTC  

por que no los dos?

2018-07-10 15:37:40 UTC  

who got upset cuz Trump wants to deport her toilet-cleaner