Message from @scaryred24
Discord ID: 477906147416997888
I'm talking about American
so, if you define a union as a collective of workers banding together in a group that expands outside any specific company, in an effort to remain connected and informed so they are not taken advantage of by their employer, then i say there can be times when they are necessary, but they are not always necessary.
however, if you are talking about what is especially legal mafia's, which is what current unions in the US are like, i agree they are not necessary.
yes I am talking about the legal mafias
yes, i agree. hence why i said they have too much power
The first one I might call collective bargaining
I think social media would be better if users hosted their content on their own platforms and third party apps could inject user content into their feeds instead of platforms like YouTube controlling all of the data and forcing users to comply with their restricting terms of service
you'd get the same issue,
the app could block the feeds/links/content from being sent over
Apps could still restrict content from their feeds but they couldn't monopolize the content and would allow for dozens of apps being able to share the same content.
the clips would still have to be hosted from somewhere, which would be susceptible too
There are hundreds of hosting companies world wide, it's unlikely all of them would activity sensor clips and even if that were to happen, creating a new hosting company is trivial compared to creating a new social media platform.
This idea however, would not be able to prevent ISPs or dns registrars from sensoring. You'd need a lower level solution to prevent that. But this would at least help remove links from the chain of sensorship
That’s called google
I propose a gaming debate. Legend of Zelda's Rito and Zora are not anthropomorphic (furries). Change my mind. <@&464233153654030360>
Fuck you you're just a furry in denial
define furry
accept that you want to fuck the anthro fish
hello?
Uh, scalies
oy vey, don't disturb me when I'm palying Crash Bandicoot
no
mee6 keeps on supressing my posts
I can accept the Zora being alien and unique enough not to count as furry, but the Rito definitely are unless you're arguing that birds don't count because they lack fur
like wtf
I'm arguing that they're not human-shaped birds.
antros are antros
they are not human
BY THE WAY
Rito are actually evolved Zora.
is mee6 supressing you too?
What makes a fantasy race not an anthro, in your opinion?
i seen that blip off for me
You can say that they're their own race, but from a design standpoint they're absolutely anthropomorphized birds
they are literally a different intelligent species
In my opinion, they would be, by all definition, a form of x animal.
if a furry is a "anthropomorphized animal" then it would logically need to have a real-life counter part for this definition to work, i.e., fox-furry, horse-furry, etc
Hylians arent even human, they are more akin to elves
doesnt need to exist in real life to count
See: Dragons
but then it leaves out shit like dragons
it's all semantics
what is a furry even?