but the idea of what is a "typical" union is probably different depending on cultures.

I'm talking about American

so, if you define a union as a collective of workers banding together in a group that expands outside any specific company, in an effort to remain connected and informed so they are not taken advantage of by their employer, then i say there can be times when they are necessary, but they are not always necessary.

however, if you are talking about what is especially legal mafia's, which is what current unions in the US are like, i agree they are not necessary.

yes I am talking about the legal mafias

yes, i agree. hence why i said they have too much power

The first one I might call collective bargaining

I think social media would be better if users hosted their content on their own platforms and third party apps could inject user content into their feeds instead of platforms like YouTube controlling all of the data and forcing users to comply with their restricting terms of service

you'd get the same issue,

the app could block the feeds/links/content from being sent over

Apps could still restrict content from their feeds but they couldn't monopolize the content and would allow for dozens of apps being able to share the same content.

the clips would still have to be hosted from somewhere, which would be susceptible too

There are hundreds of hosting companies world wide, it's unlikely all of them would activity sensor clips and even if that were to happen, creating a new hosting company is trivial compared to creating a new social media platform.

This idea however, would not be able to prevent ISPs or dns registrars from sensoring. You'd need a lower level solution to prevent that. But this would at least help remove links from the chain of sensorship

That’s called google

I propose a gaming debate. Legend of Zelda's Rito and Zora are not anthropomorphic (furries). Change my mind. <@&464233153654030360>

Fuck you you're just a furry in denial

define furry

accept that you want to fuck the anthro fish

hello?

Uh, scalies

oy vey, don't disturb me when I'm palying Crash Bandicoot

no

bad

mee6 keeps on supressing my posts

I can accept the Zora being alien and unique enough not to count as furry, but the Rito definitely are unless you're arguing that birds don't count because they lack fur

like wtf

I'm arguing that they're not human-shaped birds.

antros are antros

they are not human

BY THE WAY

Rito are actually evolved Zora.

is mee6 supressing you too?

What makes a fantasy race not an anthro, in your opinion?

i seen that blip off for me

You can say that they're their own race, but from a design standpoint they're absolutely anthropomorphized birds

they are literally a different intelligent species

In my opinion, they would be, by all definition, a form of x animal.

if a furry is a "anthropomorphized animal" then it would logically need to have a real-life counter part for this definition to work, i.e., fox-furry, horse-furry, etc

Hylians arent even human, they are more akin to elves

doesnt need to exist in real life to count
See: Dragons

but then it leaves out shit like dragons

it's all semantics