!agree

Hey

Hmm. I've thought of something similar in terms of how someone can be born into an unconsensual society within Ancapistahn the same way people do now in the United States.

The thing is at that point it will no longer be considered anarcho capitalism.

✅

It's kind of like debating the state of how Antimatter exists. It's difficult because as soon as antimatter comes in contact with our physical reality, it dissolves immediately.

If you want to be *technical*

the point is that as soon as it comes into contact with our existence it seizes to exist.

It's been tested, it's a violent explosion.

*the darkness*

alright now that Alex Jones is banned. How long until Tim Pool is banned from youtube?

hello @RyeNorth my old friend

🕵

I was paid 25 rubles to say that

what

The problem here with the proposed theory, is that in order for it to function peacefully, the individuals within the society would have to be virtuous and non malicious towards one another.

As in any other proposed theory.

However in this one specifically the individuals virtue and commitment towards each other is exacerbated.

Along with any malice.

What are your thoughts on this @NativeInterface

fuck

I'm slacking

In order for the society to not completely fall apart the individuals within it have to be of a high quality.

can I post a link

already do

no but I go 90

not trying to die ffs

No I'll just pretend to accept their legitimacy and bow down, slowing down to only 10+ when I notice their presence

however as soon as they are not around I will continue to live freely

You can consider them illegitimate and live freely while they are not in oversight while also avoiding getting fucked

I don't know what that is

Also I don't flip off cops because that's not in my interest

what's the point in attracting unwanted attention while speeding down the high way

if you plan on breaking the laws the last thing you want to do is get the states attention

the less they notice me speeding the better

o shit

it juan

👍

*See You Space Cowboy...*

I'm not an ancap

Just an anarchist.

Why take anyone legitimate.

I don't care.

So long as people don't attempt taking my property 🔫

I mean

If I don't

Not really.

It's simple. He can start by gaining my respect

👍 Possibly

🍻

anarchism is more a way of life

Than a "system."

Yes

Exactly

and don't take my paint from me

Not really

Also, don't try to paint on my canvas without my consent

🔫

I stick to mine, you stick to yours.

It can also be the mindset or practice of living stateless,

In your mind.

In mine it's liberating.

To view the world as a vacuum, a blank slate.

I probably wasn't here for that then.

It will no longer be anarcho capitalism because it goes against the principles of anarcho capitalism. The same way as when you put the donger in the booty you are violating the principles of christianity.

Liberty better keep happening 😤

You could use that same logic to state that every time you form a new state, it will be demolished.

As that is also a pattern that recurs.

It's nature.

*We live in a society.*

Communism isn't

No

Communism is "work place democracy."

Communism is "people collectively owning the means of production."

Very different

I don't get how so many people are confused about this.

It's because of all the definition changes and brain washing in communist text

We need Definitions here.

Define "Communism" and "capitalism." @RyeNorth

We need a definition.

In terms of how we are discussing about it.

Unfortunately equity is completely subjective.

Rye attempted to define "anarcho communism." something that does not exist.

"without the need of state or hierarchy."

yes

the big gringo

f

"and all are equal."

They need to organize

and regulate

Not even "someone calling the shots" they need to organize and regulate uniformity.

In order to reach that *golden state* of ***equality***

Ancap is very different

What about people in that group who are taller than others

It is very different, even to it's core principles.

By the way I've debated plenty of communists who unfortunately denied everything you just defined about communism.

Because it's impossible to defend.

It's so hard to defend they deny what it even is