Message from @FullySemiAutomatic

Discord ID: 510307242419945472


2018-11-08 11:02:57 UTC  

Thats a classic argument.

2018-11-08 11:03:22 UTC  

Politicians as a class can be effectively become.obsolete if you follow 34 simple rules.

2018-11-08 15:48:00 UTC  

Honestly, we could probably do away with EC, if we restricted voting to landowners...🤔

2018-11-08 16:08:49 UTC  

I dare the Dem House to spend the next 2 years writing a constitutional amendment to abolish the EC, lol.

2018-11-09 00:56:45 UTC  

pOPuLaR VoTE iS GooD.

2018-11-09 01:09:20 UTC  

Well, I disagree...

2018-11-09 01:09:44 UTC  

I'm for counting every vote of a 2Million city as half or 1/4 of one living in the woods.

2018-11-09 01:16:13 UTC  

That was sarcasm

2018-11-09 01:16:29 UTC  

hence the way it was spelled

2018-11-09 02:30:24 UTC  

I know it comes up every election, but what are your thoughts on the odds of someone uncovering real, serious election fraud this year?

2018-11-09 02:30:48 UTC  

Some of these seem...fishy.

2018-11-09 02:31:29 UTC  

it's too easy to hide it.

2018-11-09 02:32:10 UTC  

block observers, "find" some ballots, replace others with fakes. all ballots are anonymous so there's no way to know.

2018-11-09 02:32:50 UTC  

whoops! found 10k absentee ballots in the back of this unmarked van.

2018-11-09 02:35:23 UTC  

with a conspiracy, the larger the number of people that necessarily have to be involved the harder it is to maintain. there's more people, so there's more chance of something leaking, or someone having a change of conscious.

2018-11-09 02:36:33 UTC  

but when you're dealing with utopians, it's less likely that someone is going to have a change of conscious. the people committing election fraud believe they are saving the world.

2018-11-09 02:39:26 UTC  

there have been slip-ups, like <https://twitter.com/Tim_Canova/status/1060575611868114944> but no one is going to come forward and fess up. and without that it's not possible to prove anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

2018-11-09 02:49:35 UTC  

I guess the only interesting thing this time around is that all the big mainstream republicans are openly calling it fraud.

2018-11-09 02:50:14 UTC  

That's a game of chicken and I don't really know who's going to choke.

2018-11-09 12:17:50 UTC  

so tim did a video about age bullshit

2018-11-09 12:18:32 UTC  

i have a biggo problem about this as a progressive bullshit liberaly gayfag because this whole idea only works to keep people more judgemental about ages if one was to say "lol just change your age"

2018-11-09 12:19:01 UTC  

your age isn't anything that should be changeable, it isn't like the transgender discussion at all

2018-11-09 12:21:09 UTC  

@Ottobon And where does it deviate? (minus scientist approval)

2018-11-09 12:25:18 UTC  

If you ask me, age is something that you can't actually find in your DNA. You can look at a body and determine its level of development or decay, but it doesn't tell you age. Every person is different at the rate of change to their bodies, and how often do people look different than their age? Or have problems that are only typical of someone older. Or are in better shape that is usually possible for someone as old as they are?

2018-11-09 12:26:47 UTC  

On top of that, people have different levels of "mental" age, usually we use this to refer to maturity. But there are teenagers who sometimes speak wisdoms you;d only expect in someone much older, or full on adults who behave like children

2018-11-09 12:27:12 UTC  

Age really is an arbitrary number

2018-11-09 12:34:47 UTC  

in morning i will reply meaningfully

2018-11-09 12:34:54 UTC  

but its not nearly same question

2018-11-09 12:35:36 UTC  

neither do you seem to comprehend why people who be attracted to either version of disconnect with biological reality, or its significance

2018-11-09 12:43:48 UTC  

oh wait

2018-11-09 12:44:01 UTC  

We can actually measure age incredibly accurately

2018-11-09 12:49:15 UTC  

By the way, I also just read in a journal for forensics that you can even determine sex/gender from just the teeth.

2018-11-09 12:51:00 UTC  

Wait ... I am still trying to find a study that concerns the accuracy with which age can be determined, but there is also another orthodontic journal that states that you can determine race/ethnicity from teeth.

2018-11-09 12:51:24 UTC  

"Certain morphological features of the teeth are known to show population variation which can be used to distinguish the ethnicity or ancestry. However, the determination of race from morphological features of the teeth remains debatable. These features, characteristics and occupational marks give an idea about the habits and cultural practices of a group of people/ethnicity. The dental characteristics such as the shovelling or scooping of the upper incisor (most common in Asiatic Mongoloids and Amerindians), taurodontism, chisel shaped incisors, Carabelli’s cusp, hypocone, and protostylid, peg shaping of the teeth can be used to determine the ethnicity of the individual [36-38]. According to Vij [8], Aborigines Australians, the Melanesians and the American Indians and Eskimos tend to be large toothed races with wide crowns and Lapps and Bushmen are small people with comparatively smaller teeth."

2018-11-09 12:51:44 UTC  

Krishan, Kewal, Tanuj Kanchan, and Arun K. Garg. "Dental evidence in forensic identification–An overview, methodology and present status." The open dentistry journal 9 (2015): 250.

2018-11-09 12:52:20 UTC  

Różyło-Kalinowska, Ingrid, et al. "Validity of the third molar maturity index I3M for indicating the adult age in the Polish population." Forensic science international 290 (2018): 352-e1.

2018-11-09 12:53:15 UTC  

"This study aimed to assess the application of Cameriere’s third molar maturity index (I3M) to select an individual of 18 years or older (adult) from younger than 18 years (minor) in a sample of Polish individuals. The final sample of 982 panoramic images aged between 15 to 24 years was analyzed. The specific cut-off value of I3M < 0.08 was analyzed. The specificity (Sp) and sensitivity (Se) for males were 91.2% and 86.2% respectively. The Sp and Se for females were 93% and 82.6% respectively. The probabilities of correctly classified individuals were 87.6% and 85.3%, and Bayes post-test probability was 96.3% and 97% in males and females respectively. Further analysis indicated the alternative cut-off value of I3M < 0.07, which improved the specificity, 95.3%, and 94.7%, and worsen correct classification, 86.5%, and 84.4%, in males and females, respectively. Our results showed that the specific cut-off point of I3M < 0.08 may be a useful tool for discriminating adults from minors in Poland."

2018-11-09 15:16:53 UTC  

Age is something we all go through. It is objective with no biological basis, just the effects on biology of a physical manifestation - time

2018-11-09 15:28:52 UTC  

Kind of. There is a related concept in biology called "biological age".