but instead of a google ad in the beginning its just me giving a shoutout

like ive been doing

and thurs-sat would have no sponsor

As long as the quality increases it's all good

You the expert on this. From what you see currently, how sustainable is this?

it means i can get an office and hire people

you should monitor the views if you do it that way before you plan with the money

i see no negative impact

or should say

minor

Going the dailywire and rubin report route?

but its mixed with many people excited and a few people upset

i want to hire investigators

thing is, if you have the advertorials on a schedule people might skip those

I'd personally be fine with it if the advertising was limited to a minor section.

Actually no idea, but dailywire has them doing those adverts.

Helps that they do it live as well.

I.E. a moment of 'this video is sponsored by X' before the video, but no more than that.

Yeah I don't mind the ads, having a small team would certainly offset that

the deal would be one advertorial per week

and small plugs in the beginning of three videos

if you treat them like ads on the radio and some online pod casts, like the daily wire, then i don't think its that big a problem. its just getting the ads right from the source rather than praying to all mighty google for some crumbs

I think styx pretty much said wean off youtube and focus on patrons.

what is the difference between an ad from google playing at the start of a video and an ad time has to read, so long as we know its an ad

so the sunday video would be like 4 minutes of product demo and 6 minutes of news

Sell merc or advertise them yourself. Dunno if it fits all situations.

monday-weds would be whatever i wanted with a 30 second shout out

Didnt you already do tech reviews? Cant be too different.

hard part is to stay... how do i say that... authentic... believeable... you know... if you come off as shilling something for the money it might hurt your credibility in areas related to the sponsors...

Too be honest its a tough situation here.

Based on yhe general ideas held by tims usual audience.

@I AM ERROR I doubt tim would get a sponsor that was political or in his domain at all

Most of us hate msm cause of govt or corp influence.

Only because said influence drives their narrative.

I don't think this would apply to Tim.

i wouldnt take a sponsor if the content didnt fit the things i talk about

and i wouldnt rep anything political

I dont think so either. But will the average viewer think that?

and would drop any sponsor that got political

ill be able to hire other people to do vids and itll work towards launching subverse

I think it's safe to say that the average viewer can tell the difference, just from the fact that they're not watching MSM and coming to Tim's videos in the first place. lol