i'd buy a timcast beanie

but in general the idea of doing sponsored videos on sundays is not wrong, i would only be concerned about the implementation of it... (self-ads would not bring in "outside money")

Sell enough and even the antifa will have trouble finding him

I would buy one of those beanies. It fits my style already.

they'd just attack everyone wearing a beanie

Well then, sponsored vids weekly? Make the vid something unusual and something to look forward to?

We could all show up at events so Tim can blend in. <:Kappa:327142715592540171>

Not that I dont look forward to the dailyS

if he found an engaging partner, a weekly stream could get some $$ too

Streaming hearthstone and chill?

no FUCK hearthstone, I meant talking about events for the week

a recap of sorts?

the whole point of his second channel I guess, but for his main one

things covered, uncovered, and answering Qs

Would like to see things that the MSM refuses to cover. Could be interesting.

A good one hour is good enough I guess

Go over shit that is not big enough for one vid?

it doesnt need structure honestly, but has that conversational tone/interaction with donators

Or answer questions that get brought up. Like dailywire and their mailbag sessions

ye and he can bring his opinions up as opposed to unbiased reporting, YT severely lacks a consumer->creator line unless you stream, for whatever reason

tbh youtube should seperate itself from google as a brand

barely anybody refers to youtube as a company anymore, they just say google

Thing is whoever is running the show isnt the most competant

referring to the CEO?

probably due to the 40+ hours of weekly sensitivity training

have they reduced the amount?

No shit?

I exaggerate, but google seems committed to things that arent exactly utilitarian

where did we start? ah... ad-videos on sundays... yes, monitor the views, make sure you don't sound like you want to bullshit people, 30 second donation ads might work at the end of videos but not as a replacement of sponsored, weekly stream with a partner (that does not just agree with you) might be a good idea... did i miss something?

I mean they are behaving exactly how you would expect concidering they have a monopoly and virtually no incentive to imrpove their products

they do give engineers a lot more room to improve the end products compared to other shady companies like Microsoft, Apple, etc

besides the core functionality of youtube and google ofc

the rest of their products get regular improvements and aren't too beurocratic

they also contribute quite a bit to extremely useful open source projects that don't actually make them money currently such as https://www.dartlang.org/ https://flutter.io/

i'd say TensorFlow but they use it quite a bit internally and it's integrated pretty heavily into a few GCP products

End fake news? not a chance

would be nice if journalists in general had integrity for the truth

too bad it's all agenda based these days

In theory, once AI becomes advanced enough, we could use them as impartial editors/curators for news

The problem is, by the time AI becomes advanced enough to do that, the people creating them will have ways of making the AI think it's unbiased even though it is

I don't think we'll ever get to that point, since rarely are events ever so cut-and-dry.